# AgentDB Learning Flow: How Skills Learn and Improve **Purpose**: Complete explanation of how AgentDB stores, retrieves, and uses creation interactions to improve future skill generation. --- ## 🎯 **The Big Picture: Learning Feedback Loop** ``` User Request Skill Creation ↓ Agent Creator Uses /references + AgentDB Learning ↓ Skill Created & Deployed ↓ Creation Decision Stored in AgentDB ↓ Future Requests Benefit from Past Learning ↓ (Loop continues with each new creation) ``` --- ## 📊 **What Exactly Gets Stored in AgentDB?** ### **1. Creation Episodes (Reflexion Store)** **When**: Every time a skill is created **Format**: Structured episode data ```python # From _store_creation_decision(): session_id = f"creation-{datetime.now().strftime('%Y%m%d-%H%M%S')}" # Data stored: { "session_id": "creation-20251024-103406", "task": "agent_creation_decision", "reward": "85.0", # Success probability * 100 "success": true, # If creation succeeded "input": user_input, # "Create financial analysis agent..." "output": intelligence, # Template choice, improvements, etc. "latency": creation_time_ms, "critique": auto_generated_analysis } ``` **Real Example** (from our tests): ```bash agentdb reflexion retrieve "agent creation" 5 0.0 # Retrieved episodes show: #1: Episode 1 # Task: agent_creation_decision # Reward: 0.00 ← Note: Our test returned 0.00 (no success feedback yet) # Success: No # Similarity: 0.785 ``` ### **2. Causal Relationships (Causal Edges)** **When**: After each creation decision **Purpose**: Learn cause→effect patterns ```python # From _store_creation_decision(): if intelligence.template_choice: self._execute_agentdb_command([ "npx", "agentdb", "causal", "store", f"user_input:{user_input[:50]}...", # Cause f"template_selected:{intelligence.template_choice}", # Effect "created_successfully" # Outcome ]) # Stored as causal edge: { "cause": "user_input:Create financial analysis agent for stocks...", "effect": "template_selected:financial-analysis-template", "uplift": 0.25, # Calculated from success rate "confidence": 0.8, "sample_size": 1 } ``` ### **3. Skills Database (Learned Patterns)** **When**: When patterns are identified from multiple episodes **Purpose**: Store reusable skills and patterns ```python # From _enhance_with_real_agentdb(): skills_result = self._execute_agentdb_command([ "agentdb", "skill", "search", user_input, "5" ]) # Skills stored as: { "name": "financial-analysis-skill", "description": "Pattern for financial analysis agents", "code": "learned_code_patterns", "success_rate": 0.85, "uses": 12, "domain": "finance" } ``` --- ## 🔍 **How Data Is Retrieved and Used** ### **Step 1: User Makes Request** ``` "Create financial analysis agent for stock market data" ``` ### **Step 2: AgentDB Queries Past Episodes** ```python # From _enhance_with_real_agentdb(): episodes_result = self._execute_agentdb_command([ "agentdb", "reflexion", "retrieve", user_input, "3", "0.6" ]) ``` **What this query does:** - Finds similar past creation requests - Returns top 3 most relevant episodes - Minimum similarity threshold: 0.6 - Includes success rates and outcomes **Example Retrieved Data:** ```python episodes = [ { "task": "agent_creation_decision", "success": True, "reward": 85.0, "input": "Create stock analysis tool with RSI indicators", "template_used": "financial-analysis-template" }, { "task": "agent_creation_decision", "success": False, "reward": 0.0, "input": "Build financial dashboard", "template_used": "generic-dashboard-template" } ] ``` ### **Step 3: Calculate Success Patterns** ```python # From _parse_episodes_from_output(): if episodes: success_rate = sum(1 for e in episodes if e.get('success', False)) / len(episodes) intelligence.success_probability = success_rate # Example calculation: # Episodes: [success=True, success=False, success=True] # Success rate: 2/3 = 0.667 ``` ### **Step 4: Query Causal Effects** ```python # From _enhance_with_real_agentdb(): causal_result = self._execute_agentdb_command([ "agentdb", "causal", "query", f"use_{domain}_template", "", "0.7", "0.1", "5" ]) ``` **What this learns:** - Which templates work best for which domains - Historical success rates by template - Causal relationships between inputs and outcomes ### **Step 5: Select Optimal Template** ```python # From causal effects analysis: effects = [ {"cause": "finance_domain", "effect": "financial-template", "uplift": 0.25}, {"cause": "finance_domain", "effect": "generic-template", "uplift": 0.10} ] # Choose best effect: best_effect = max(effects, key=lambda x: x.get('uplift', 0)) intelligence.template_choice = "financial-analysis-template" intelligence.mathematical_proof = f"Causal uplift: {best_effect['uplift']:.2%}" ``` --- ## 🔄 **Complete Learning Flow Example** ### **First Creation (No Learning Data)** ``` User: "Create financial analysis agent" ↓ AgentDB Query: reflexion retrieve "financial analysis" (0 results) ↓ Template Selection: Uses /references guidelines (static) ↓ Choice: financial-analysis-template ↓ Storage: - Episode stored with success=unknown - Causal edge: "financial analysis" → "financial-template" ``` ### **Tenth Creation (Rich Learning Data)** ``` User: "Create financial analysis agent for cryptocurrency" ↓ AgentDB Query: reflexion retrieve "financial analysis" (12 results) ↓ Success Analysis: - financial-template: 80% success (8/10) - generic-template: 40% success (2/5) ↓ Causal Query: causal query "use_financial_template" ↓ Result: financial-template shows 0.25 uplift for finance domain ↓ Enhanced Decision: - Template: financial-template (based on 80% success rate) - Confidence: 0.80 (from historical data) - Mathematical Proof: "Causal uplift: 25%" - Learned Improvements: ["Include RSI indicators", "Add volatility analysis"] ``` --- ## 📈 **How Improvement Actually Happens** ### **1. Success Rate Learning** **Pattern**: Template success rates improve over time ```python # After 5 uses of financial-template: success_rate = successful_creatures / total_creatures # Example: 4/5 = 0.8 (80% success rate) # This influences future template selection: if success_rate > 0.7: prefer_this_template = True ``` ### **2. Feature Learning** **Pattern**: Agent learns which features work for which domains ```python # From successful episodes: successful_features = extract_common_features([ "RSI indicators", "MACD analysis", "volume analysis" ]) # Added to learned improvements: intelligence.learned_improvements = [ "Include RSI indicators (82% success rate)", "Add MACD analysis (75% success rate)", "Volume analysis recommended (68% success rate)" ] ``` ### **3. Domain Specialization** **Pattern**: Templates become domain-specialized ```python # Causal learning shows: causal_edges = [ {"cause": "finance_domain", "effect": "financial-template", "uplift": 0.25}, {"cause": "climate_domain", "effect": "climate-template", "uplift": 0.30}, {"cause": "ecommerce_domain", "effect": "ecommerce-template", "uplift": 0.20} ] # Future decisions use this pattern: if "finance" in user_input: recommended_template = "financial-template" # 25% uplift ``` --- ## 🎯 **Key Insights About the Learning Process** ### **1. Learning is Cumulative** - Every creation adds to the knowledge base - More episodes = better pattern recognition - Success rates become more reliable over time ### **2. Learning is Domain-Specific** - Templates specialize for particular domains - Cross-domain patterns are identified - Generic vs specialized recommendations ### **3. Learning is Measurable** - Success rates are tracked numerically - Causal effects have confidence scores - Mathematical proofs provide evidence ### **4. Learning is Adaptive** - Failed attempts influence future decisions - Successful patterns are reinforced - System self-corrects based on outcomes --- ## 🔧 **Technical Implementation Details** ### **Storage Commands Used** ```python # 1. Store episode (reflexion) agentdb reflexion store [critique] [input] [output] # 2. Store causal edge agentdb causal add-edge [confidence] [sample-size] # 3. Store skill pattern agentdb skill create [code] # 4. Query episodes agentdb reflexion retrieve [k] [min-reward] [only-failures] [only-successes] # 5. Query causal effects agentdb causal query [cause] [effect] [min-confidence] [min-uplift] [limit] # 6. Search skills agentdb skill search [k] ``` ### **Data Flow in Code** ```python def enhance_agent_creation(user_input, domain): # Step 1: Retrieve relevant past episodes episodes = query_similar_episodes(user_input) # Step 2: Analyze success patterns success_rate = calculate_success_rate(episodes) # Step 3: Query causal relationships causal_effects = query_causal_effects(domain) # Step 4: Search for relevant skills relevant_skills = search_skills(user_input) # Step 5: Make enhanced decision intelligence = AgentDBIntelligence( template_choice=select_best_template(causal_effects), success_probability=success_rate, learned_improvements=extract_improvements(relevant_skills), mathematical_proof=generate_causal_proof(causal_effects) ) # Step 6: Store this decision for future learning store_creation_decision(user_input, intelligence) return intelligence ``` --- ## 🎉 **Summary: From "Magic" to Understandable Process** **What seemed like magic is actually a systematic learning process:** 1. **Store** every creation decision with context and outcomes 2. **Query** past decisions when new requests arrive 3. **Analyze** patterns of success and failure 4. **Enhance** new decisions with learned insights 5. **Improve** continuously with each interaction The AgentDB bridge turns Agent Creator from a **static tool** into a **learning system** that gets smarter with every skill created!