zhongwei/gh-francyjglisboa-agent-skill-creator-agent-skill-creator-plugin
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Initial commit

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Zhongwei Li
2025-11-29 18:27:28 +08:00
commit 8db9c44dd8
79 changed files with 37715 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

685
skills/FrancyJGLisboa__agent-skill-creator/references/context-aware-activation.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,685 @@
# Context-Aware Activation System v1.0
**Version:** 1.0
**Purpose:** Advanced context filtering for precise skill activation and false positive reduction
**Target:** Reduce false positives from 2% to <1% while maintaining 99.5%+ reliability
---
## 🎯 **Overview**
Context-Aware Activation enhances the 3-Layer Activation System by analyzing the semantic and contextual environment of user queries to ensure skills activate only in appropriate situations.
### **Problem Solved**
**Before:** Skills activated based purely on keyword/pattern matching, leading to false positives in inappropriate contexts
**After:** Skills evaluate contextual relevance before activation, dramatically reducing inappropriate activations
---
## 🧠 **Context Analysis Framework**
### **Multi-Dimensional Context Analysis**
The system evaluates query context across multiple dimensions:
#### **1. Domain Context**
```json
{
"domain_context": {
"current_domain": "finance",
"confidence": 0.92,
"related_domains": ["trading", "investment", "market"],
"excluded_domains": ["healthcare", "education", "entertainment"]
}
}
```
#### **2. Task Context**
```json
{
"task_context": {
"current_task": "analysis",
"task_stage": "exploration",
"task_complexity": "medium",
"required_capabilities": ["data_processing", "calculation"]
}
}
```
#### **3. User Intent Context**
```json
{
"intent_context": {
"primary_intent": "analyze",
"secondary_intents": ["compare", "evaluate"],
"intent_strength": 0.87,
"urgency_level": "medium"
}
}
```
#### **4. Conversational Context**
```json
{
"conversational_context": {
"conversation_stage": "problem_identification",
"previous_queries": ["stock market trends", "investment analysis"],
"context_coherence": 0.94,
"topic_consistency": 0.89
}
}
```
---
## 🔍 **Context Detection Algorithms**
### **Semantic Context Extraction**
```python
def extract_semantic_context(query, conversation_history=None):
"""Extract semantic context from query and conversation"""
context = {
'entities': extract_named_entities(query),
'concepts': extract_key_concepts(query),
'relationships': extract_entity_relationships(query),
'sentiment': analyze_sentiment(query),
'urgency': detect_urgency(query)
}
# Analyze conversation history if available
if conversation_history:
context['conversation_coherence'] = analyze_coherence(
query, conversation_history
)
context['topic_evolution'] = track_topic_evolution(
conversation_history
)
return context
def extract_named_entities(query):
"""Extract named entities from query"""
entities = {
'organizations': [],
'locations': [],
'persons': [],
'products': [],
'technical_terms': []
}
# Use NLP library or pattern matching
# Implementation depends on available tools
return entities
def extract_key_concepts(query):
"""Extract key concepts and topics"""
concepts = {
'primary_domain': identify_primary_domain(query),
'secondary_domains': identify_secondary_domains(query),
'technical_concepts': extract_technical_terms(query),
'business_concepts': extract_business_terms(query)
}
return concepts
```
### **Context Relevance Scoring**
```python
def calculate_context_relevance(query, skill_config, extracted_context):
"""Calculate how relevant the query context is to the skill"""
relevance_scores = {}
# Domain relevance
relevance_scores['domain'] = calculate_domain_relevance(
skill_config['expected_domains'],
extracted_context['concepts']['primary_domain']
)
# Task relevance
relevance_scores['task'] = calculate_task_relevance(
skill_config['supported_tasks'],
extracted_context['intent_context']['primary_intent']
)
# Capability relevance
relevance_scores['capability'] = calculate_capability_relevance(
skill_config['capabilities'],
extracted_context['required_capabilities']
)
# Context coherence
relevance_scores['coherence'] = extracted_context.get(
'conversation_coherence', 0.5
)
# Calculate weighted overall relevance
weights = {
'domain': 0.3,
'task': 0.25,
'capability': 0.25,
'coherence': 0.2
}
overall_relevance = sum(
score * weights[category]
for category, score in relevance_scores.items()
)
return {
'overall_relevance': overall_relevance,
'category_scores': relevance_scores,
'recommendation': evaluate_relevance_threshold(overall_relevance)
}
def evaluate_relevance_threshold(relevance_score):
"""Determine activation recommendation based on relevance"""
if relevance_score >= 0.9:
return {'activate': True, 'confidence': 'high', 'reason': 'Strong context match'}
elif relevance_score >= 0.7:
return {'activate': True, 'confidence': 'medium', 'reason': 'Good context match'}
elif relevance_score >= 0.5:
return {'activate': False, 'confidence': 'low', 'reason': 'Weak context match'}
else:
return {'activate': False, 'confidence': 'very_low', 'reason': 'Poor context match'}
```
---
## 🚫 **Context Filtering System**
### **Negative Context Detection**
```python
def detect_negative_context(query, skill_config):
"""Detect contexts where skill should NOT activate"""
negative_indicators = {
'excluded_domains': [],
'conflicting_intents': [],
'inappropriate_contexts': [],
'resource_constraints': []
}
# Check for excluded domains
excluded_domains = skill_config.get('contextual_filters', {}).get('excluded_domains', [])
query_domains = identify_query_domains(query)
for domain in query_domains:
if domain in excluded_domains:
negative_indicators['excluded_domains'].append({
'domain': domain,
'reason': f'Domain "{domain}" is explicitly excluded'
})
# Check for conflicting intents
conflicting_intents = identify_conflicting_intents(query, skill_config)
negative_indicators['conflicting_intents'] = conflicting_intents
# Check for inappropriate contexts
inappropriate_contexts = check_context_appropriateness(query, skill_config)
negative_indicators['inappropriate_contexts'] = inappropriate_contexts
# Calculate negative score
negative_score = calculate_negative_score(negative_indicators)
return {
'should_block': negative_score > 0.7,
'negative_score': negative_score,
'indicators': negative_indicators,
'recommendation': generate_block_recommendation(negative_score)
}
def check_context_appropriateness(query, skill_config):
"""Check if query context is appropriate for skill activation"""
inappropriate = []
# Check if user is asking for help with existing tools
if any(phrase in query.lower() for phrase in [
'how to use', 'help with', 'tutorial', 'guide', 'explain'
]):
if 'tutorial' not in skill_config.get('capabilities', {}):
inappropriate.append({
'type': 'help_request',
'reason': 'User requesting help, not task execution'
})
# Check if user is asking about theory or education
if any(phrase in query.lower() for phrase in [
'what is', 'explain', 'define', 'theory', 'concept', 'learn about'
]):
if 'educational' not in skill_config.get('capabilities', {}):
inappropriate.append({
'type': 'educational_query',
'reason': 'User asking for education, not task execution'
})
# Check if user is trying to debug or troubleshoot
if any(phrase in query.lower() for phrase in [
'debug', 'error', 'problem', 'issue', 'fix', 'troubleshoot'
]):
if 'debugging' not in skill_config.get('capabilities', {}):
inappropriate.append({
'type': 'debugging_query',
'reason': 'User asking for debugging help'
})
return inappropriate
```
### **Context-Aware Decision Engine**
```python
def make_context_aware_decision(query, skill_config, conversation_history=None):
"""Make final activation decision considering all context factors"""
# Extract context
context = extract_semantic_context(query, conversation_history)
# Calculate relevance
relevance = calculate_context_relevance(query, skill_config, context)
# Check for negative indicators
negative_context = detect_negative_context(query, skill_config)
# Get confidence threshold from skill config
confidence_threshold = skill_config.get(
'contextual_filters', {}
).get('confidence_threshold', 0.7)
# Make decision
should_activate = True
decision_reasons = []
# Check negative context first (blocking condition)
if negative_context['should_block']:
should_activate = False
decision_reasons.append(f"Blocked: {negative_context['recommendation']['reason']}")
# Check relevance threshold
elif relevance['overall_relevance'] < confidence_threshold:
should_activate = False
decision_reasons.append(f"Low relevance: {relevance['overall_relevance']:.2f} < {confidence_threshold}")
# Check confidence level
elif relevance['recommendation']['confidence'] == 'low':
should_activate = False
decision_reasons.append(f"Low confidence: {relevance['recommendation']['reason']}")
# If passing all checks, recommend activation
else:
decision_reasons.append(f"Approved: {relevance['recommendation']['reason']}")
return {
'should_activate': should_activate,
'confidence': relevance['recommendation']['confidence'],
'relevance_score': relevance['overall_relevance'],
'negative_score': negative_context['negative_score'],
'decision_reasons': decision_reasons,
'context_analysis': {
'relevance': relevance,
'negative_context': negative_context,
'extracted_context': context
}
}
```
---
## 📋 **Enhanced Marketplace Configuration**
### **Context-Aware Configuration Structure**
```json
{
"name": "skill-name",
"activation": {
"keywords": [...],
"patterns": [...],
"_comment": "NEW: Context-aware filtering",
"contextual_filters": {
"required_context": {
"domains": ["finance", "trading", "investment"],
"tasks": ["analysis", "calculation", "comparison"],
"entities": ["stock", "ticker", "market"],
"confidence_threshold": 0.8
},
"excluded_context": {
"domains": ["healthcare", "education", "entertainment"],
"tasks": ["tutorial", "help", "debugging"],
"query_types": ["question", "definition", "explanation"],
"user_states": ["learning", "exploring"]
},
"context_weights": {
"domain_relevance": 0.35,
"task_relevance": 0.30,
"intent_strength": 0.20,
"conversation_coherence": 0.15
},
"activation_rules": {
"min_relevance_score": 0.75,
"max_negative_score": 0.3,
"required_coherence": 0.6,
"context_consistency_check": true
}
}
},
"capabilities": {
"technical_analysis": true,
"data_processing": true,
"_comment": "NEW: Context capabilities",
"context_requirements": {
"min_confidence": 0.8,
"required_domains": ["finance"],
"supported_tasks": ["analysis", "calculation"]
}
}
}
```
---
## 🧪 **Context Testing Framework**
### **Context Test Generation**
```python
def generate_context_test_cases(skill_config):
"""Generate test cases for context-aware activation"""
test_cases = []
# Positive context tests (should activate)
positive_contexts = [
{
'query': 'Analyze AAPL stock using RSI indicator',
'context': {'domain': 'finance', 'task': 'analysis', 'intent': 'analyze'},
'expected': True,
'reason': 'Perfect domain and task match'
},
{
'query': 'I need to compare MSFT vs GOOGL performance',
'context': {'domain': 'finance', 'task': 'comparison', 'intent': 'compare'},
'expected': True,
'reason': 'Domain match with supported task'
}
]
# Negative context tests (should NOT activate)
negative_contexts = [
{
'query': 'Explain what stock analysis is',
'context': {'domain': 'education', 'task': 'explanation', 'intent': 'learn'},
'expected': False,
'reason': 'Educational context, not task execution'
},
{
'query': 'How to use the stock analyzer tool',
'context': {'domain': 'help', 'task': 'tutorial', 'intent': 'learn'},
'expected': False,
'reason': 'Tutorial request, not analysis task'
},
{
'query': 'Debug my stock analysis code',
'context': {'domain': 'programming', 'task': 'debugging', 'intent': 'fix'},
'expected': False,
'reason': 'Debugging context, not supported capability'
}
]
# Edge case tests
edge_cases = [
{
'query': 'Stock market trends for healthcare companies',
'context': {'domain': 'finance', 'subdomain': 'healthcare', 'task': 'analysis'},
'expected': True,
'reason': 'Finance domain with healthcare subdomain - should activate'
},
{
'query': 'Teach me about technical analysis',
'context': {'domain': 'education', 'topic': 'technical_analysis'},
'expected': False,
'reason': 'Educational context despite relevant topic'
}
]
test_cases.extend(positive_contexts)
test_cases.extend(negative_contexts)
test_cases.extend(edge_cases)
return test_cases
def run_context_aware_tests(skill_config, test_cases):
"""Run context-aware activation tests"""
results = []
for i, test_case in enumerate(test_cases):
query = test_case['query']
expected = test_case['expected']
reason = test_case['reason']
# Simulate context analysis
decision = make_context_aware_decision(query, skill_config)
result = {
'test_id': i + 1,
'query': query,
'expected': expected,
'actual': decision['should_activate'],
'correct': expected == decision['should_activate'],
'confidence': decision['confidence'],
'relevance_score': decision['relevance_score'],
'decision_reasons': decision['decision_reasons'],
'test_reason': reason
}
results.append(result)
# Log result
status = "✅" if result['correct'] else "❌"
print(f"{status} Test {i+1}: {query}")
if not result['correct']:
print(f" Expected: {expected}, Got: {decision['should_activate']}")
print(f" Reasons: {'; '.join(decision['decision_reasons'])}")
# Calculate metrics
total_tests = len(results)
correct_tests = sum(1 for r in results if r['correct'])
accuracy = correct_tests / total_tests if total_tests > 0 else 0
return {
'total_tests': total_tests,
'correct_tests': correct_tests,
'accuracy': accuracy,
'results': results
}
```
---
## 📊 **Performance Monitoring**
### **Context-Aware Metrics**
```python
class ContextAwareMonitor:
"""Monitor context-aware activation performance"""
def __init__(self):
self.metrics = {
'total_queries': 0,
'context_filtered': 0,
'false_positives_prevented': 0,
'context_analysis_time': [],
'relevance_scores': [],
'negative_contexts_detected': []
}
def log_context_decision(self, query, decision, actual_outcome=None):
"""Log context-aware activation decision"""
self.metrics['total_queries'] += 1
# Track context filtering
if not decision['should_activate'] and decision['relevance_score'] > 0.5:
self.metrics['context_filtered'] += 1
# Track prevented false positives (if we have feedback)
if actual_outcome == 'false_positive_prevented':
self.metrics['false_positives_prevented'] += 1
# Track relevance scores
self.metrics['relevance_scores'].append(decision['relevance_score'])
# Track negative contexts
if decision['negative_score'] > 0.5:
self.metrics['negative_contexts_detected'].append({
'query': query,
'negative_score': decision['negative_score'],
'reasons': decision['decision_reasons']
})
def generate_performance_report(self):
"""Generate context-aware performance report"""
total = self.metrics['total_queries']
if total == 0:
return "No data available"
context_filter_rate = self.metrics['context_filtered'] / total
avg_relevance = sum(self.metrics['relevance_scores']) / len(self.metrics['relevance_scores'])
report = f"""
Context-Aware Performance Report
================================
Total Queries Analyzed: {total}
Queries Filtered by Context: {self.metrics['context_filtered']} ({context_filter_rate:.1%})
False Positives Prevented: {self.metrics['false_positives_prevented']}
Average Relevance Score: {avg_relevance:.3f}
Top Negative Context Categories:
"""
# Analyze negative contexts
negative_reasons = {}
for context in self.metrics['negative_contexts_detected']:
for reason in context['reasons']:
negative_reasons[reason] = negative_reasons.get(reason, 0) + 1
for reason, count in sorted(negative_reasons.items(), key=lambda x: x[1], reverse=True)[:5]:
report += f" - {reason}: {count}\n"
return report
```
---
## 🔄 **Integration with Existing System**
### **Enhanced 3-Layer Activation**
```python
def enhanced_three_layer_activation(query, skill_config, conversation_history=None):
"""Enhanced 3-layer activation with context awareness"""
# Layer 1: Keyword matching (existing)
keyword_match = check_keyword_matching(query, skill_config['activation']['keywords'])
# Layer 2: Pattern matching (existing)
pattern_match = check_pattern_matching(query, skill_config['activation']['patterns'])
# Layer 3: Description understanding (existing)
description_match = check_description_relevance(query, skill_config)
# NEW: Layer 4: Context-aware filtering
context_decision = make_context_aware_decision(query, skill_config, conversation_history)
# Make final decision
base_match = keyword_match or pattern_match or description_match
if not base_match:
return {
'should_activate': False,
'reason': 'No base layer match',
'layers_matched': [],
'context_filtered': False
}
if not context_decision['should_activate']:
return {
'should_activate': False,
'reason': f'Context filtered: {"; ".join(context_decision["decision_reasons"])}',
'layers_matched': get_matched_layers(keyword_match, pattern_match, description_match),
'context_filtered': True,
'context_score': context_decision['relevance_score']
}
return {
'should_activate': True,
'reason': f'Approved: {context_decision["recommendation"]["reason"]}',
'layers_matched': get_matched_layers(keyword_match, pattern_match, description_match),
'context_filtered': False,
'context_score': context_decision['relevance_score'],
'confidence': context_decision['confidence']
}
```
---
## ✅ **Implementation Checklist**
### **Configuration Requirements**
- [ ] Add `contextual_filters` section to marketplace.json
- [ ] Define `required_context` domains and tasks
- [ ] Define `excluded_context` for false positive prevention
- [ ] Set appropriate `confidence_threshold`
- [ ] Configure `context_weights` for domain-specific needs
### **Testing Requirements**
- [ ] Generate context test cases for each skill
- [ ] Test positive context scenarios
- [ ] Test negative context scenarios
- [ ] Validate edge cases and boundary conditions
- [ ] Monitor false positive reduction
### **Performance Requirements**
- [ ] Context analysis time < 100ms
- [ ] Relevance calculation accuracy > 90%
- [ ] False positive reduction > 50%
- [ ] No negative impact on true positive rate
---
## 📈 **Expected Outcomes**
### **Performance Improvements**
- **False Positive Rate**: 2% → **<1%**
- **Context Precision**: 60% → **85%**
- **User Satisfaction**: 85% → **95%**
- **Activation Reliability**: 98% → **99.5%**
### **User Experience Benefits**
- Skills activate only in appropriate contexts
- Reduced confusion and frustration
- More predictable and reliable behavior
- Better understanding of skill capabilities
---
**Version:** 1.0
**Last Updated:** 2025-10-24
**Maintained By:** Agent-Skill-Creator Team