4.4 KiB
Research Paper Template
Title: [Enter Research Paper Title Here - Should be Concise and Descriptive]
Author(s): [Author Name(s)]
Affiliation: [Institution/Department]
Email: [Corresponding author email]
Abstract
[150-250 words summarizing the entire paper. Include: background, objective, methodology, key results, and conclusion. Write this LAST after completing the paper.]
Keywords: keyword1, keyword2, keyword3, keyword4, keyword5
I. Introduction
[Background and context - 2-3 paragraphs]
[Problem statement - 1-2 paragraphs explaining the gap or issue]
[Research objectives/questions - Clear statement of what this paper aims to achieve]
[Significance/contribution - Why this work matters]
[Paper organization - Brief overview of remaining sections]
II. Literature Review / Related Work
A. Subsection Title
[Review existing research organized thematically]
[Identify what has been done, what gaps exist]
B. Subsection Title
[Continue organizing by themes or chronologically]
[Synthesize findings, don't just summarize]
C. Research Gap
[Clearly articulate what is missing in current research]
[Explain how your work addresses this gap]
III. Methodology
A. Research Design
[Describe overall approach: experimental, analytical, survey, etc.]
B. Data Collection
[Explain how data was gathered]
[Sample size, selection criteria]
C. Analysis Methods
[Statistical methods, algorithms, frameworks used]
[Justification for chosen methods]
D. Tools and Materials
[Software, hardware, datasets used]
IV. Results
A. Result Category 1
[Present findings clearly and objectively]
[Use figures and tables to support]
Table I: Sample Table Title
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Data | Data | Data |
B. Result Category 2
[Continue presenting results systematically]
[Refer to figures: "Fig. 1 shows..."]
V. Discussion
A. Interpretation of Results
[Explain what the results mean]
[Connect to research questions/objectives]
B. Comparison with Existing Work
[How do results compare to literature?]
[Agreements and contradictions]
C. Implications
[Practical or theoretical significance]
[Broader impact of findings]
D. Limitations
[Acknowledge study limitations honestly]
[Discuss how they affect conclusions]
VI. Conclusion
[Summarize key findings - 1 paragraph]
[Restate contributions - 1 paragraph]
[Future research directions - 1 paragraph]
Acknowledgment
[Optional: Acknowledge funding, collaborators, or assistance]
References
[1] First Author, Second Author, and Third Author, "Title of article," Journal Name, vol. X, no. Y, pp. ZZ-ZZ, Month Year.
[2] Author Name, "Title of conference paper," in Proc. Conference Name, City, Country, Year, pp. ZZ-ZZ.
[3] Author Name, Book Title, Edition. City, State: Publisher, Year.
[Continue numbering sequentially in order of appearance in text]
Writing Guidelines
Before You Start:
- Define your research question clearly
- Conduct thorough literature review
- Organize your thoughts and create outline
- Gather all data and materials
While Writing:
- Use formal, objective language
- Support all claims with citations
- Maintain logical flow between paragraphs
- Use clear topic sentences
- Include transitions
- Define technical terms
- Number figures and tables consecutively
After Drafting:
- Revise for clarity and concision
- Check all citations match references
- Verify IEEE format compliance
- Proofread for grammar and spelling
- Have colleagues review
- Read aloud to catch awkward phrasing
Common Mistakes to Avoid:
- Unsupported claims (always cite)
- Passive voice overuse
- Vague statements ("many researchers")
- Missing transitions
- Inconsistent terminology
- Plagiarism
- Informal language
- Missing citations
Checklist Before Submission
- Title is clear and descriptive
- Abstract is 150-250 words
- All sections present and complete
- Every claim cited appropriately
- All references in IEEE format
- References numbered correctly
- Figures and tables properly labeled
- Consistent terminology throughout
- Grammar and spelling checked
- Formatting matches journal requirements
- Word count within limits
- Co-authors reviewed and approved
- Conflicts of interest disclosed
- Funding acknowledged