# Academic Writing Conventions ## Table of Contents 1. Academic Tone and Voice 2. Sentence and Paragraph Construction 3. Argumentation and Logic 4. Common Errors to Avoid 5. Discipline-Specific Conventions ## 1. Academic Tone and Voice ### Formality Levels **High Formality (STEM, Law, Medicine):** - Avoid contractions (use "cannot" not "can't") - Minimize personal pronouns - Use passive voice strategically - Employ technical terminology precisely **Moderate Formality (Social Sciences, Humanities):** - Personal pronouns acceptable in methodology - Active voice preferred for clarity - Balance between accessibility and precision ### Objectivity **Maintain neutrality:** - Present multiple perspectives - Acknowledge counterarguments - Use hedging language: "suggests," "appears," "may indicate" - Avoid absolute statements: "proves," "always," "never" **Hedge appropriately:** - Strong evidence: "demonstrates," "shows," "indicates" - Moderate evidence: "suggests," "implies," "may reflect" - Weak evidence: "might," "could," "appears to" ### Precision **Be specific:** - ❌ "Many studies show..." - ✅ "A meta-analysis of 47 studies [1] demonstrates..." **Use technical terms correctly:** - Define specialized terms on first use - Maintain consistency in terminology - Use standard abbreviations ## 2. Sentence and Paragraph Construction ### Sentence Structure **Clarity principles:** - One main idea per sentence - Subject-verb proximity - Active voice for clarity (when appropriate) - Vary sentence length for readability **Examples:** ❌ Weak: "It was found by the researchers that the algorithm performed better." ✅ Strong: "The algorithm demonstrated superior performance [1]." ❌ Weak: "There are many factors that contribute to climate change." ✅ Strong: "Multiple factors contribute to climate change, including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, and industrial activity [2]." ### Paragraph Structure **Standard academic paragraph:** 1. **Topic sentence**: Introduces main idea 2. **Evidence**: Supporting data, citations, examples 3. **Analysis**: Interpretation and explanation 4. **Link**: Connection to thesis or transition to next point **Example:** "Machine learning algorithms have transformed medical diagnostics [Topic]. Recent studies demonstrate that deep learning models achieve diagnostic accuracy comparable to expert physicians in radiology [1], dermatology [2], and pathology [3] [Evidence]. This performance stems from the algorithms' ability to recognize complex patterns in large datasets that may elude human observation [Analysis]. These advances suggest a paradigm shift in clinical decision-making processes [Link]." ### Transitions **Between paragraphs:** - However, Moreover, Furthermore - In contrast, Similarly, Conversely - Consequently, Therefore, Thus - First, Second, Finally **Within paragraphs:** - Additionally, Also, Furthermore - For example, For instance, Specifically - In other words, That is to say - Nevertheless, Nonetheless, Still ## 3. Argumentation and Logic ### Thesis Development **Strong thesis characteristics:** - Specific and focused - Arguable (not self-evident) - Supported by evidence - Addresses "so what?" question **Examples:** ❌ Weak: "Social media affects society." ✅ Strong: "Social media platforms' algorithmic curation of content contributes to political polarization by creating echo chambers that reinforce existing beliefs and limit exposure to diverse viewpoints." ### Evidence Integration **Citation placement:** **Author-prominent:** "Smith et al. [1] argue that quantum computing will revolutionize cryptography." **Information-prominent:** "Quantum computing threatens current cryptographic methods [1], [2]." **Synthesis of multiple sources:** "While some researchers emphasize the benefits of AI in education [1], [3], others highlight potential risks [2], [4]." ### Logical Fallacies to Avoid 1. **Hasty generalization**: Drawing broad conclusions from limited evidence 2. **False causation**: Assuming correlation implies causation 3. **Appeal to authority**: Relying solely on credentials without evidence 4. **Straw man**: Misrepresenting opposing arguments 5. **Cherry picking**: Selecting only supporting evidence ## 4. Common Errors to Avoid ### Wordiness ❌ "Due to the fact that" ✅ "Because" ❌ "In order to" ✅ "To" ❌ "It is important to note that" ✅ Delete (unnecessary) ### Redundancy ❌ "Past history," "future plans," "advance warning" ✅ "History," "plans," "warning" ### Vague Language ❌ "Things," "stuff," "a lot," "very" ✅ Specific nouns and precise quantifiers ### Inappropriate Register ❌ "The data is super interesting and shows..." ✅ "The data reveals significant patterns..." ### Anthropomorphism ❌ "The study wants to prove..." ✅ "This study aims to demonstrate..." ❌ "The paper believes that..." ✅ "This paper argues that..." ## 5. Discipline-Specific Conventions ### STEM Fields **Characteristics:** - Emphasis on methodology and reproducibility - Extensive use of figures, tables, equations - Passive voice acceptable in methods sections - Present tense for established facts, past tense for specific studies **Example:** "Samples were collected from five sites (Methods). Figure 1 shows the temperature distribution (Results). These findings indicate that thermal gradients affect reaction rates (Discussion)." ### Social Sciences **Characteristics:** - Theoretical frameworks prominently discussed - Qualitative and quantitative methods - First-person acceptable in reflective methodology - Past tense for research conducted, present for ongoing debate **Example:** "Previous research suggests that socioeconomic factors influence educational outcomes [1]. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 30 participants to explore this relationship." ### Humanities **Characteristics:** - Emphasis on interpretation and analysis - Extensive engagement with primary texts - Present tense for discussing texts/artworks - More flexible citation practices (footnotes common) **Example:** "In Pride and Prejudice, Austen critiques the marriage market of Regency England. Elizabeth Bennet's refusal of Mr. Collins represents a radical assertion of female autonomy." ### Engineering **Characteristics:** - Focus on problem-solving and implementation - Detailed technical specifications - Extensive use of diagrams and schematics - Clear delineation of requirements and results **Example:** "The proposed architecture achieves 95% accuracy with 40% lower computational complexity than existing methods [1]. Figure 2 illustrates the system design." ## Best Practices Summary 1. **Clarity over complexity**: Simple, direct language conveys ideas more effectively 2. **Evidence-based claims**: Support all assertions with citations 3. **Logical structure**: Organize ideas hierarchically and sequentially 4. **Consistent terminology**: Use terms uniformly throughout 5. **Appropriate tone**: Match formality to discipline and audience 6. **Active engagement**: Show critical thinking, not just summary 7. **Revision**: Multiple drafts improve quality significantly ## Self-Review Checklist - [ ] Each paragraph has clear topic sentence - [ ] Claims supported by evidence - [ ] Transitions between ideas smooth - [ ] Tone formal and objective - [ ] Technical terms defined - [ ] No logical fallacies - [ ] Sentence variety maintained - [ ] Citations integrated smoothly - [ ] Discipline conventions followed - [ ] "So what?" question answered