Initial commit
This commit is contained in:
97
skills/spec-scaffold/templates/adr.md
Normal file
97
skills/spec-scaffold/templates/adr.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
|
||||
[DATE] - [ARCHITECTURE_DECISION_NAME]
|
||||
===
|
||||
|
||||
## Motivation
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
Motivation Example
|
||||
===
|
||||
|
||||
Our database is heavy on read operations than write operations. After users is growing, we need to optimize read performance to ensure low latency and high availability.
|
||||
|
||||
### Stackholder
|
||||
|
||||
- **Users**: Expect fast response times when accessing data.
|
||||
- **Developers**: Need to maintain and scale the database efficiently.
|
||||
|
||||
### Problem Statement
|
||||
|
||||
The current database setup is struggling to handle the increasing read load, leading to slow response times and potential downtime during peak usage periods.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
[DESCRIPTION_OF_THE_DECISION_PROBLEM]
|
||||
|
||||
### Stakeholders
|
||||
|
||||
- [STAKEHOLDER_1]: [ROLE_AND_INTEREST]
|
||||
- [STAKEHOLDER_2]: [ROLE_AND_INTEREST]
|
||||
|
||||
### Problem Statement
|
||||
|
||||
[DETAILED_DESCRIPTION_OF_THE_PROBLEM]
|
||||
|
||||
## Proposed Solution
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
Proposed Solution Example
|
||||
===
|
||||
|
||||
We have considered the following solutions to address the read performance issue:
|
||||
|
||||
### Redis Caching
|
||||
|
||||
Implementing Redis as an in-memory caching layer to store frequently accessed data. This will reduce the load on the primary database and speed up read operations.
|
||||
|
||||
### Read Replicas
|
||||
|
||||
Setting up read replicas of the primary database to distribute read traffic. This will help in balancing the load and improving read performance.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
### [SOLUTION_NAME]
|
||||
|
||||
[DESCRIPTION_OF_SOLUTION]
|
||||
|
||||
### [SOLUTION_NAME]
|
||||
|
||||
[DESCRIPTION_OF_SOLUTION]
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
Decision Example
|
||||
===
|
||||
|
||||
After evaluating the proposed solutions, we have decided to implement Redis Caching because it provides a significant performance boost for read operations with relatively low complexity and cost.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
After evaluating the proposed solutions, we have decided to implement [CHOSEN_SOLUTION_NAME] because [REASON_FOR_CHOICE].
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
|
||||
Consequences Example
|
||||
===
|
||||
|
||||
Implementing Redis Caching will have the following consequences:
|
||||
|
||||
### Positive Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
- Improved read performance, leading to faster response times for users.
|
||||
- Reduced load on the primary database, enhancing overall system stability.
|
||||
|
||||
### Negative Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
- Additional infrastructure to manage and maintain (Redis server).
|
||||
- Potential data consistency issues if cache is not properly invalidated.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
### Positive Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
- [POSITIVE_CONSEQUENCE_1]
|
||||
- [POSITIVE_CONSEQUENCE_2]
|
||||
|
||||
### Negative Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
- [NEGATIVE_CONSEQUENCE_1]
|
||||
- [NEGATIVE_CONSEQUENCE_2]
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user