Initial commit

commands/analyze.md

@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
+---
+model: claude-sonnet-4-0
+allowed-tools: Task
+argument-hint: <problem-or-question> [complexity-level] [perspective-count]
+description: Multi-persona analysis using split-team framework with cognitive harmonics and productive disagreement
+---
+
+# Multi-Persona Analysis Command
+
+Orchestrate sophisticated multi-perspective analysis of problems using the split-team framework. Assemble optimal persona teams, facilitate cognitive harmonics, and synthesize insights through productive disagreement.
+
+## How It Works
+
+This command invokes the persona-coordinator agent to:
+1. Analyze your problem and determine required perspectives
+2. Assemble an optimal team of 3-7 persona agents
+3. Orchestrate divergent analysis from each perspective
+4. Facilitate productive disagreement and assumption challenging
+5. Synthesize insights into coherent, actionable recommendations
+
+## Arguments
+
+**$1 (Required)**: Problem statement or question to analyze
+
+**$2 (Optional)**: Complexity level
+- `simple`: 3-4 personas, straightforward analysis
+- `moderate`: 5-6 personas, balanced trade-offs (default)
+- `complex`: 7+ personas, multifaceted challenges
+
+**$3 (Optional)**: Number of personas (3-10)
+- Overrides complexity-based team size
+- Must be between 3 and 10
+
+## Examples
+
+### Simple Analysis
+```bash
+/analyze "Should we use REST or GraphQL for our API?" simple
+```
+Assembles: Analytical Thinker + Pragmatic Realist + Systems Architect
+
+### Moderate Analysis (Default)
+```bash
+/analyze "Design an authentication system for our platform"
+```
+Assembles: Systems Architect + Risk Analyst + User Advocate + Pragmatic Realist + Constructive Critic
+
+### Complex Analysis
+```bash
+/analyze "Should we migrate from monolith to microservices?" complex
+```
+Assembles: Systems Architect + Risk Analyst + Pragmatic Realist + Creative Innovator + Constructive Critic + User Advocate + Analytical Thinker
+
+### Custom Team Size
+```bash
+/analyze "Evaluate our tech stack choices" moderate 6
+```
+Assembles: 6 most relevant personas for the problem
+
+## Use Cases
+
+**Architecture Decisions**
+- Technology selection
+- System design choices
+- Migration strategies
+- Scaling approaches
+
+**Product Strategy**
+- Feature prioritization
+- User experience design
+- Market positioning
+- Competitive analysis
+
+**Technical Challenges**
+- Performance optimization
+- Security hardening
+- Debugging complex issues
+- Code architecture review
+
+**Strategic Planning**
+- Long-term technology roadmap
+- Resource allocation
+- Risk assessment
+- Innovation opportunities
+
+## What You Get
+
+1. **Diverse Perspectives**: Each persona contributes unique insights through their specialized lens
+2. **Productive Disagreement**: Constructive challenge of assumptions and alternatives
+3. **Cognitive Harmonics**: Emergent insights from persona interactions
+4. **Synthesis**: Coherent integration of perspectives with clear recommendations
+5. **Trade-off Clarity**: Explicit acknowledgment of competing concerns and balanced choices
+
+## Split-Team Framework Principles
+
+**Voice Differentiation**: Each persona maintains unique vocabulary, questions, and analytical approach
+
+**Cognitive Harmonics**: Multiple perspectives create constructive interference for emergent insights
+
+**Productive Disagreement**: Systematic challenge strengthens solutions and prevents groupthink
+
+**Integration Synthesis**: Coordinator weaves perspectives into coherent, actionable guidance
+
+## Tips for Best Results
+
+1. **Be Specific**: Provide context and constraints in your problem statement
+2. **State Goals**: Mention success criteria or what you're optimizing for
+3. **Match Complexity**: Use simple for straightforward questions, complex for critical decisions
+4. **Trust the Process**: Persona disagreement is valuable, not problematic
+5. **Implementation Focus**: Include practical constraints for realistic recommendations
+
+## Example Session
+
+```bash
+/analyze "We need to choose between PostgreSQL and MongoDB for user data storage. We have 10M users, need strong consistency, but want flexibility for future features." moderate
+```
+
+**Result**: Assembles 5 personas who examine through data/performance (Analytical Thinker), implementation reality (Pragmatic Realist), system architecture (Systems Architect), risk factors (Risk Analyst), and challenges assumptions (Constructive Critic). Synthesis provides clear recommendation with rationale and acknowledged trade-offs.
+
+Invoke the persona-coordinator agent with: $ARGUMENTS