Initial commit

commands/ultrathink.md

@@ -0,0 +1,219 @@
+---
+model: claude-opus-4-1
+allowed-tools: Task, Read, Write, Bash(*), Glob, Grep
+argument-hint: <complex-problem> [--domain=<expertise>] [--challenge-level=<intensity>]
+description: Maximum cognitive diversity orchestrator with guest expert persona capabilities
+---
+
+# Ultra-Cognitive Analysis Engine
+
+Execute maximum cognitive diversity analysis by assuming multiple expert personas simultaneously and orchestrating complex problem-solving with constructive disagreement protocols. Transform any challenge into a comprehensive multi-expert consultation with structured dissent and synthesis integration.
+
+## Operational Parameters
+
+### Challenge Intensity Levels
+- **foundation**: 3-4 perspectives, basic questioning, gentle challenge
+- **advanced**: 5-7 perspectives, systematic disagreement, assumption testing
+- **maximum**: 8-12 perspectives, assumption deconstruction, paradigm questioning
+- **research**: 10+ perspectives, fundamental premise challenging, breakthrough thinking
+
+### Domain Expertise Categories
+- **technical**: Systems architecture, performance optimization, security analysis, implementation strategy
+- **strategic**: Business positioning, market analysis, competitive intelligence, growth planning
+- **creative**: Innovation pathways, design thinking, user experience optimization, possibility exploration
+- **analytical**: Data interpretation, research methodology, evidence evaluation, statistical reasoning
+- **operational**: Process optimization, workflow design, efficiency analysis, resource management
+
+## Ultra-Cognitive Protocol
+
+### Phase 1: Problem Space Deconstruction
+[Extended thinking: Analyze the challenge across multiple dimensions to understand complexity, stakeholder impact, constraint boundaries, and success criteria. Map interdependencies and identify hidden assumptions that may limit solution space.]
+
+**Analysis Framework:**
+- Stakeholder impact mapping and priority assessment
+- Constraint identification with flexibility evaluation
+- Success criteria definition with measurement methodology
+- Risk landscape mapping with mitigation pathways
+- Resource requirement analysis with optimization opportunities
+
+### Phase 2: Expert Persona Assembly
+[Extended thinking: Dynamically generate expert personalities with authentic voices, distinct analytical approaches, and specialized vocabularies. Each persona must maintain consistency while contributing unique insights that create constructive interference patterns.]
+
+**Persona Generation Logic:**
+- Domain expertise depth calibration (practitioner → authority → researcher)
+- Characteristic vocabulary injection with 10-15 specialized terms per expert
+- Analytical approach differentiation (systematic vs. intuitive vs. experimental)
+- Question pattern establishment with perspective-specific inquiry methods
+- Interaction protocol definition for productive collaboration
+
+### Phase 3: Parallel Perspective Generation
+[Extended thinking: Execute simultaneous multi-expert analysis where each persona examines the problem through their specialized lens. Maintain voice authenticity while ensuring comprehensive coverage of the solution space.]
+
+**Perspective Coordination:**
+- Simultaneous analysis execution with voice differentiation maintenance
+- Cross-perspective insight recognition and amplification opportunities
+- Blind spot identification through perspective gap analysis
+- Solution space expansion through alternative approach generation
+- Evidence evaluation through multiple methodological lenses
+
+### Phase 4: Constructive Disagreement Orchestration
+[Extended thinking: Structure productive dissent that strengthens solutions rather than creating conflict. Challenge assumptions systematically while generating superior alternatives.]
+
+**Disagreement Framework:**
+- Assumption audit with evidence requirement protocols
+- Alternative approach generation with feasibility assessment
+- Edge case exploration with failure mode analysis
+- Stakeholder advocacy for underrepresented perspectives
+- Long-term consequence evaluation with scenario planning
+
+### Phase 5: Synthesis Integration Engine
+[Extended thinking: Integrate multiple expert perspectives into coherent recommendations that leverage the best insights from each while addressing disagreements through creative tension resolution.]
+
+**Integration Methodology:**
+- Common ground identification with shared principle extraction
+- Creative tension resolution through innovative approach synthesis
+- Trade-off analysis with optimization pathway recommendations
+- Implementation roadmap creation with risk mitigation strategies
+- Success metrics definition with progress tracking frameworks
+
+## Guest Expert Persona System
+
+### Expertise Depth Calibration
+**Practitioner Level (5-10 years experience)**
+- Hands-on implementation focus with practical constraint awareness
+- Tool and methodology fluency with best practice knowledge
+- Problem pattern recognition with solution template application
+- Risk awareness through experience-based intuition
+
+**Authority Level (15+ years experience)**
+- Strategic thinking with long-term perspective integration
+- Industry trend awareness with competitive landscape knowledge
+- Innovation capability with creative solution generation
+- Mentorship perspective with knowledge transfer optimization
+
+**Researcher Level (cutting-edge expertise)**
+- Paradigm-questioning capability with fundamental assumption challenging
+- Experimental methodology with hypothesis-driven exploration
+- Cross-domain knowledge integration with pattern transfer ability
+- Future-state visioning with possibility space expansion
+
+### Voice Differentiation Protocols
+**Vocabulary Specialization**
+- Domain-specific terminology injection with natural usage patterns
+- Metaphor family consistency with conceptual bridge creation
+- Question pattern establishment with inquiry style differentiation
+- Communication style calibration with audience adaptation capability
+
+**Analytical Approach Variation**
+- Evidence evaluation methodology with different validation criteria
+- Problem decomposition strategy with unique structural approaches
+- Solution generation process with distinct creative methodologies
+- Risk assessment framework with specialized threat model application
+
+## Execution Examples
+
+### Example 1: Technical Architecture Decision
+```bash
+ultrathink "Should we migrate from monolith to microservices?" --domain=technical --challenge-level=maximum
+```
+
+**Expected Expert Assembly (12 perspectives):**
+- **System Architect**: Overall design patterns and structural implications
+- **Performance Engineer**: Latency, throughput, and scalability considerations
+- **Security Specialist**: Attack surface changes and security boundary implications
+- **DevOps Engineer**: Deployment complexity and operational overhead analysis
+- **Database Architect**: Data consistency and transaction boundary management
+- **Frontend Developer**: Client-side integration and API design implications
+- **Cost Analyst**: Infrastructure and development cost implications
+- **Risk Manager**: Migration risks and rollback strategy evaluation
+- **Team Lead**: Development team impact and skill requirement assessment
+- **Customer Advocate**: User experience impact during migration process
+- **Legacy Modernization Expert**: Migration strategy and transition planning
+- **Devil's Advocate**: Alternative approaches and contrarian perspectives
+
+**Structured Disagreement Topics:**
+- Migration timing and phased vs. big-bang approaches
+- Service boundary definition and granularity optimization
+- Data consistency vs. performance trade-offs
+- Development complexity vs. operational flexibility
+- Short-term disruption vs. long-term architectural benefits
+
+### Example 2: Strategic Business Decision
+```bash
+ultrathink "Enter the AI automation market with our SaaS platform" --domain=strategic --challenge-level=advanced
+```
+
+**Expected Expert Assembly (7 perspectives):**
+- **Market Analyst**: Market size, growth trends, and competitive landscape
+- **Product Strategist**: Product-market fit and differentiation opportunities
+- **Technology Evaluator**: Technical feasibility and development requirements
+- **Financial Planner**: Investment requirements and revenue projections
+- **Risk Manager**: Market risks and competitive response scenarios
+- **Customer Development**: Target customer validation and adoption barriers
+- **Competitive Intelligence**: Competitor analysis and positioning strategy
+
+### Example 3: Creative Problem Solving
+```bash
+ultrathink "Improve user onboarding experience" --domain=creative --challenge-level=foundation
+```
+
+**Expected Expert Assembly (4 perspectives):**
+- **UX Designer**: User journey optimization and interface design principles
+- **Behavioral Psychologist**: User motivation and engagement psychology
+- **Product Manager**: Business objectives and success metrics alignment
+- **Frontend Developer**: Implementation feasibility and technical constraints
+
+## Advanced Orchestration Features
+
+### Dynamic Persona Switching
+The orchestrator can assume any expert persona mid-analysis for deep-dive questioning:
+```
+"Switching to Security Specialist persona to examine this authentication approach..."
+"Assuming Database Architect role to evaluate this data consistency strategy..."
+```
+
+### Meta-Cognitive Monitoring
+Track and optimize the analysis process itself:
+- **Perspective Coverage Assessment**: Ensure comprehensive viewpoint representation
+- **Insight Quality Evaluation**: Identify breakthrough vs. incremental insights
+- **Disagreement Productivity**: Measure constructive vs. destructive tension
+- **Synthesis Effectiveness**: Evaluate integration quality and actionability
+
+### Adaptive Complexity Management
+Automatically adjust analysis depth based on:
+- Problem complexity detection through multi-dimensional assessment
+- User sophistication recognition through interaction pattern analysis
+- Time constraint accommodation with priority-based perspective selection
+- Resource availability with optimal expert allocation
+
+## Success Metrics
+
+### Analysis Quality Indicators
+- **Perspective Diversity**: 8+ distinct viewpoints with minimal overlap
+- **Insight Novelty**: 3+ breakthrough insights not obvious from single perspectives
+- **Disagreement Productivity**: Structured dissent leading to solution improvements
+- **Synthesis Coherence**: Integrated recommendations addressing multiple expert concerns
+- **Actionability**: Clear implementation pathways with success criteria
+
+### User Experience Measures
+- **Comprehension**: Complex concepts made accessible through expert explanation
+- **Confidence**: Increased decision-making confidence through comprehensive analysis
+- **Learning**: User understanding enhancement through expert knowledge transfer
+- **Efficiency**: Faster problem resolution through parallel expert consultation
+
+## Usage Guidelines
+
+### When to Use Ultrathink
+- **Complex Decisions**: Multi-dimensional challenges requiring diverse expertise
+- **Strategic Planning**: Long-term decisions with significant implications
+- **Innovation Challenges**: Breaking through conventional thinking limitations
+- **Conflict Resolution**: Structured disagreement for optimal solution finding
+- **Learning Goals**: Understanding complex topics through expert perspectives
+
+### Optimization Strategies
+- **Challenge Level Calibration**: Start with foundation level, escalate as needed
+- **Domain Focus**: Specify primary expertise area for relevant expert selection
+- **Time Management**: Higher challenge levels require more processing time
+- **Follow-up Exploration**: Use insights for deeper investigation with specialized tools
+
+The ultrathink command represents the pinnacle of AI-assisted cognitive diversity, transforming complex challenges into comprehensive multi-expert consultations with structured analysis and actionable synthesis.