Initial commit
This commit is contained in:
301
commands/adaptive_mentor.md
Normal file
301
commands/adaptive_mentor.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,301 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
model: claude-sonnet-4-0
|
||||
allowed-tools: Task, Read, Write, Bash(*), Glob, Grep
|
||||
argument-hint: <learning-goal> [--style-detection=<method>] [--adaptation-frequency=<level>] [--pathway=<personalization-approach>]
|
||||
description: Dynamic learning style optimization with real-time pedagogical adaptation
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Adaptive Mentoring System
|
||||
|
||||
Dynamically detect learning styles and preferences, then adapt teaching approaches in real-time for optimal knowledge transfer and skill development. Create personalized learning experiences that honor individual differences while maximizing learning effectiveness through continuous adaptation.
|
||||
|
||||
## Learning Style Detection Framework
|
||||
|
||||
### Behavioral Analysis (Learning action pattern analysis)
|
||||
[Extended thinking: Observe how learners engage with different types of content and activities to infer preferred learning approaches.]
|
||||
|
||||
**Behavioral Indicators:**
|
||||
- **Information Processing Preferences**: Sequential vs. random, detail-first vs. big-picture-first
|
||||
- **Engagement Patterns**: Active participation vs. reflective observation, individual vs. collaborative work
|
||||
- **Question Types**: Factual clarification vs. conceptual exploration vs. application-focused
|
||||
- **Feedback Response**: How learners react to different types of guidance and correction
|
||||
- **Pace Preferences**: Rapid progression vs. thorough exploration vs. variable speed
|
||||
|
||||
**Detection Methods:**
|
||||
- Monitor interaction patterns with different content types
|
||||
- Analyze question formulation and inquiry approaches
|
||||
- Observe engagement levels with various learning activities
|
||||
- Track progress rates across different learning modalities
|
||||
- Assess response patterns to different feedback styles
|
||||
|
||||
**Adaptation Triggers:**
|
||||
- Decreased engagement signals need for approach modification
|
||||
- Question patterns reveal preferred information processing style
|
||||
- Progress velocity indicates optimal complexity and pacing levels
|
||||
- Feedback reception shows effective motivation and support approaches
|
||||
|
||||
### Linguistic Analysis (Communication preference identification)
|
||||
[Extended thinking: Analyze language patterns, vocabulary choices, and communication styles to understand how learners prefer to receive and process information.]
|
||||
|
||||
**Linguistic Indicators:**
|
||||
- **Vocabulary Preferences**: Technical vs. metaphorical, concrete vs. abstract, formal vs. conversational
|
||||
- **Explanation Styles**: Step-by-step vs. holistic, example-driven vs. principle-first
|
||||
- **Question Formulation**: Specific vs. open-ended, practical vs. theoretical, immediate vs. exploratory
|
||||
- **Conceptual Expression**: Visual descriptions vs. logical reasoning vs. emotional connections
|
||||
- **Learning Language**: How learners naturally describe their understanding and confusion
|
||||
|
||||
**Detection Process:**
|
||||
1. **Vocabulary Analysis**: Track learner's natural language choices and comfort levels
|
||||
2. **Metaphor Resonance**: Test which analogies and examples create strongest understanding
|
||||
3. **Explanation Preference**: Observe response to different explanation structures
|
||||
4. **Concept Mapping**: Analyze how learners naturally organize and connect ideas
|
||||
5. **Communication Flow**: Assess comfort with different interaction styles
|
||||
|
||||
**Adaptation Applications:**
|
||||
- Match explanation vocabulary to learner's natural language style
|
||||
- Use metaphors and examples that resonate with learner's experience
|
||||
- Structure explanations in learner's preferred organizational pattern
|
||||
- Adapt questioning style to learner's natural inquiry approach
|
||||
|
||||
### Cognitive Analysis (Information processing style recognition)
|
||||
[Extended thinking: Identify how learners naturally process, organize, and retain information to optimize learning approach for their cognitive strengths.]
|
||||
|
||||
**Cognitive Style Indicators:**
|
||||
- **Processing Mode**: Visual-spatial vs. verbal-linguistic vs. logical-mathematical vs. kinesthetic
|
||||
- **Attention Pattern**: Focused sustained attention vs. distributed parallel processing
|
||||
- **Memory Strategy**: Rote repetition vs. conceptual organization vs. experiential association
|
||||
- **Problem-Solving Approach**: Systematic analysis vs. intuitive leaps vs. trial-and-error experimentation
|
||||
- **Abstraction Comfort**: Concrete examples needed vs. comfortable with abstract concepts
|
||||
|
||||
**Assessment Framework:**
|
||||
- **Visual Processing**: Response to diagrams, charts, spatial representations
|
||||
- **Auditory Processing**: Engagement with verbal explanations, discussions, sound patterns
|
||||
- **Kinesthetic Processing**: Learning through movement, manipulation, hands-on experience
|
||||
- **Analytical Processing**: Preference for logical sequences, systematic breakdowns
|
||||
- **Intuitive Processing**: Comfort with pattern recognition, holistic understanding
|
||||
|
||||
**Optimization Strategies:**
|
||||
- Provide information in learner's strongest processing modality
|
||||
- Supplement primary mode with complementary approaches for reinforcement
|
||||
- Build cognitive bridges between comfortable and challenging processing styles
|
||||
- Develop weaker processing areas through supported practice
|
||||
|
||||
### Emotional Analysis (Motivation and engagement pattern analysis)
|
||||
[Extended thinking: Understand emotional drivers, motivation patterns, and engagement triggers to create psychologically supportive and motivating learning experiences.]
|
||||
|
||||
**Emotional Learning Patterns:**
|
||||
- **Motivation Sources**: Intrinsic curiosity vs. external validation vs. practical application vs. social connection
|
||||
- **Challenge Response**: Energized by difficulty vs. overwhelmed by complexity vs. bored by simplicity
|
||||
- **Error Handling**: Growth mindset vs. fixed mindset vs. perfectionist tendencies
|
||||
- **Social Learning**: Independent work vs. collaborative exploration vs. teaching others
|
||||
- **Achievement Recognition**: Process appreciation vs. outcome celebration vs. progress acknowledgment
|
||||
|
||||
**Emotional Intelligence Integration:**
|
||||
1. **Motivation Calibration**: Align learning activities with individual motivation sources
|
||||
2. **Challenge Optimization**: Provide appropriate difficulty level for maximum engagement
|
||||
3. **Emotional Safety**: Create supportive environment for intellectual risk-taking
|
||||
4. **Confidence Building**: Structure experiences for incremental success and growth
|
||||
5. **Stress Management**: Recognize and address learning anxiety or overwhelm
|
||||
|
||||
**Adaptive Responses:**
|
||||
- Adjust encouragement style to learner's motivation patterns
|
||||
- Calibrate challenge level to maintain optimal arousal and engagement
|
||||
- Provide appropriate support during confusion or frustration
|
||||
- Celebrate progress in ways that resonate with learner's achievement preferences
|
||||
|
||||
## Adaptation Trigger Framework
|
||||
|
||||
### Real-Time Response Calibration
|
||||
[Extended thinking: Continuously monitor learning indicators and adjust approach immediately when signals suggest current method isn't optimal.]
|
||||
|
||||
**Immediate Adaptation Triggers:**
|
||||
- **Engagement Drop**: Decreased interaction, shorter responses, passive participation
|
||||
- **Confusion Signals**: Repeated questions, inability to build on concepts, error patterns
|
||||
- **Pace Mismatch**: Rushing through material vs. getting lost in details
|
||||
- **Style Misalignment**: Low resonance with examples, metaphors, or explanation approaches
|
||||
- **Emotional Indicators**: Frustration, anxiety, boredom, or discomfort signals
|
||||
|
||||
**Response Protocols:**
|
||||
1. **Diagnostic Questions**: Quick assessment to understand specific challenge
|
||||
2. **Approach Modification**: Immediate shift to alternative explanation or activity style
|
||||
3. **Emotional Reset**: Address emotional state before continuing content delivery
|
||||
4. **Learning Check**: Verify understanding before proceeding with new material
|
||||
5. **Strategy Discussion**: Meta-conversation about learning approach effectiveness
|
||||
|
||||
### Progressive Adaptation Framework
|
||||
[Extended thinking: Systematically evolve teaching approach based on accumulated learning about individual learner patterns and preferences.]
|
||||
|
||||
**Long-Term Pattern Recognition:**
|
||||
- **Style Consistency**: Which approaches consistently work well for this learner
|
||||
- **Growth Patterns**: How learner's needs and capabilities evolve over time
|
||||
- **Transfer Success**: Which learning approaches lead to successful application
|
||||
- **Retention Patterns**: What types of learning experiences create lasting understanding
|
||||
- **Engagement Evolution**: How motivation and interest patterns change with competence growth
|
||||
|
||||
**Adaptation Evolution:**
|
||||
1. **Pattern Documentation**: Track effective approaches and response patterns
|
||||
2. **Strategy Refinement**: Gradually optimize approach based on accumulated evidence
|
||||
3. **Capability Development**: Introduce learner to additional learning modalities
|
||||
4. **Independence Building**: Gradually transfer learning responsibility to learner
|
||||
5. **Meta-Learning**: Help learner understand their own learning patterns and preferences
|
||||
|
||||
## Personalization Approach Framework
|
||||
|
||||
### Individual Learning Profile Development
|
||||
[Extended thinking: Create comprehensive understanding of each learner's unique learning characteristics, preferences, and optimal growth pathways.]
|
||||
|
||||
**Profile Components:**
|
||||
- **Cognitive Strengths**: Primary and secondary information processing preferences
|
||||
- **Learning Preferences**: Preferred content delivery, activity types, interaction styles
|
||||
- **Motivation Patterns**: What drives engagement, curiosity, and sustained effort
|
||||
- **Challenge Tolerance**: Optimal difficulty levels and support requirements
|
||||
- **Growth Trajectory**: How learning style and capacity evolve over time
|
||||
|
||||
**Profile Building Process:**
|
||||
1. **Initial Assessment**: Gather baseline understanding of learner characteristics
|
||||
2. **Hypothesis Testing**: Try different approaches and observe effectiveness
|
||||
3. **Pattern Recognition**: Identify consistent preferences and successful strategies
|
||||
4. **Profile Refinement**: Continuously update understanding based on new evidence
|
||||
5. **Learner Collaboration**: Include learner insights about their own learning process
|
||||
|
||||
### Customized Learning Pathway Design
|
||||
[Extended thinking: Create individualized learning journeys that optimize for each learner's unique profile while achieving shared learning objectives.]
|
||||
|
||||
**Pathway Customization Elements:**
|
||||
- **Content Sequencing**: Order topics and concepts based on learner's cognitive organization preferences
|
||||
- **Activity Selection**: Choose learning activities that match learner's engagement and processing styles
|
||||
- **Pace Calibration**: Adjust learning speed to maintain optimal challenge and comprehension
|
||||
- **Support Structure**: Provide scaffolding appropriate to learner's independence and confidence levels
|
||||
- **Assessment Adaptation**: Use evaluation methods that allow learner to demonstrate understanding effectively
|
||||
|
||||
**Design Methodology:**
|
||||
1. **Goal Alignment**: Ensure pathway serves both learner objectives and learning requirements
|
||||
2. **Strength Leverage**: Build pathway around learner's cognitive and motivational strengths
|
||||
3. **Growth Inclusion**: Incorporate opportunities to develop weaker areas with appropriate support
|
||||
4. **Flexibility Integration**: Design pathway to adapt as learner grows and changes
|
||||
5. **Transfer Optimization**: Include experiences that support knowledge application and transfer
|
||||
|
||||
## Execution Examples
|
||||
|
||||
### Example 1: Technical Skill Development
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
adaptive_mentor "learn React.js for web development" --style-detection=comprehensive --adaptation-frequency=real-time --pathway=strength-based
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Learning Style Detection Results:**
|
||||
- **Cognitive Profile**: Strong visual-spatial processing, prefers hands-on experimentation
|
||||
- **Learning Preferences**: Example-driven explanations, iterative building, immediate feedback
|
||||
- **Motivation Patterns**: Energized by creating functional applications, intrinsic curiosity about how things work
|
||||
- **Challenge Response**: Comfortable with complexity when scaffolded with working examples
|
||||
- **Communication Style**: Prefers conversational tone with technical precision when needed
|
||||
|
||||
**Adaptive Mentoring Approach:**
|
||||
1. **Initial Engagement**: "Let's start by building something you can see work immediately - a simple interactive button"
|
||||
2. **Visual-First Teaching**: Provide code examples with immediate visual feedback in browser
|
||||
3. **Hands-On Discovery**: Guide experimentation with code modifications to see effects
|
||||
4. **Pattern Building**: "Notice how changing this prop affects the component behavior"
|
||||
5. **Progressive Complexity**: Start with single components, build toward component composition
|
||||
|
||||
**Real-Time Adaptations:**
|
||||
- When engagement drops during concept explanation → Switch to hands-on coding
|
||||
- When questions become detail-focused → Provide deeper technical explanations
|
||||
- When progress accelerates → Introduce more complex patterns and challenges
|
||||
- When confusion emerges → Return to concrete examples and step-by-step building
|
||||
|
||||
### Example 2: Strategic Thinking Development
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
adaptive_mentor "develop product strategy skills" --style-detection=behavioral --adaptation-frequency=session-based --pathway=collaborative
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Behavioral Pattern Detection:**
|
||||
- **Information Processing**: Big-picture first, then drill into details
|
||||
- **Engagement Style**: High engagement with collaborative discussion and debate
|
||||
- **Question Patterns**: Strategic "what-if" scenarios and long-term implication exploration
|
||||
- **Learning Preference**: Case study analysis with peer discussion and multiple perspectives
|
||||
- **Growth Response**: Energized by complex, ambiguous challenges with multiple valid approaches
|
||||
|
||||
**Adaptive Mentoring Strategy:**
|
||||
1. **Strategic Context Setting**: Begin with market landscape and competitive positioning overview
|
||||
2. **Case Study Exploration**: Use real company examples for pattern recognition and analysis
|
||||
3. **Collaborative Analysis**: Structure discussions that explore multiple strategic perspectives
|
||||
4. **Framework Application**: Introduce strategy frameworks through practical application to cases
|
||||
5. **Scenario Planning**: Explore strategic implications through what-if analysis and future modeling
|
||||
|
||||
**Session-Based Adaptations:**
|
||||
- **Session 1**: High engagement with collaborative case analysis → Continue case-based approach
|
||||
- **Session 2**: Deeper questions about frameworks → Introduce more sophisticated analytical tools
|
||||
- **Session 3**: Interest in implementation details → Add operational strategy components
|
||||
- **Session 4**: Confidence with complex scenarios → Introduce ambiguous, multi-stakeholder challenges
|
||||
|
||||
### Example 3: Creative Skill Enhancement
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
adaptive_mentor "improve design thinking abilities" --style-detection=emotional --adaptation-frequency=progressive --pathway=experiential
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Emotional Learning Profile:**
|
||||
- **Motivation Sources**: Intrinsic creativity, desire to solve meaningful human problems
|
||||
- **Challenge Comfort**: Energized by ambiguous problems, comfortable with multiple iterations
|
||||
- **Social Learning**: Benefits from collaboration but needs individual reflection time
|
||||
- **Achievement Recognition**: Values process learning over outcome perfection
|
||||
- **Creative Confidence**: Some hesitation with artistic expression, strong with logical design thinking
|
||||
|
||||
**Experiential Pathway Design:**
|
||||
1. **Problem Immersion**: Start with real human-centered design challenges
|
||||
2. **Empathy Building**: Direct user research and observation experiences
|
||||
3. **Ideation Practice**: Structured creativity exercises with psychological safety
|
||||
4. **Prototyping Exploration**: Hands-on creation with emphasis on learning over perfection
|
||||
5. **Iteration Culture**: Multiple rounds of feedback and improvement with celebration of learning
|
||||
|
||||
**Progressive Adaptations:**
|
||||
- **Week 1-2**: Build confidence through structured exercises and clear frameworks
|
||||
- **Week 3-4**: Increase ambiguity as comfort grows, introduce more open-ended challenges
|
||||
- **Week 5-6**: Add collaborative elements as individual confidence solidifies
|
||||
- **Week 7-8**: Integrate artistic expression elements as creative confidence builds
|
||||
- **Ongoing**: Develop personal design process and meta-cognitive awareness
|
||||
|
||||
## Advanced Mentoring Features
|
||||
|
||||
### Learning Analytics Integration
|
||||
[Extended thinking: Use data about learning patterns to optimize mentoring approach and predict learning needs.]
|
||||
|
||||
**Analytics Components:**
|
||||
- **Engagement Metrics**: Time on task, interaction frequency, question quality
|
||||
- **Progress Indicators**: Skill development velocity, knowledge retention, transfer success
|
||||
- **Preference Stability**: How consistent learning preferences remain over time
|
||||
- **Adaptation Effectiveness**: Which teaching modifications produce best learning outcomes
|
||||
- **Prediction Modeling**: Anticipated learning needs based on pattern recognition
|
||||
|
||||
### Meta-Learning Development
|
||||
[Extended thinking: Help learners understand their own learning process and develop self-directed learning capabilities.]
|
||||
|
||||
**Meta-Cognitive Skills:**
|
||||
- **Self-Assessment**: Accurate evaluation of own understanding and skill level
|
||||
- **Strategy Selection**: Choosing appropriate learning approaches for different goals
|
||||
- **Progress Monitoring**: Recognizing learning indicators and adjusting approach
|
||||
- **Transfer Recognition**: Identifying opportunities to apply learning in new contexts
|
||||
- **Learning Optimization**: Continuously improving personal learning effectiveness
|
||||
|
||||
**Development Process:**
|
||||
1. **Awareness Building**: Help learners notice their learning patterns and preferences
|
||||
2. **Strategy Exploration**: Introduce learners to different learning approaches and their effects
|
||||
3. **Self-Regulation**: Support learners in monitoring and adjusting their learning process
|
||||
4. **Independence Transfer**: Gradually shift learning responsibility from mentor to learner
|
||||
5. **Mastery Integration**: Help learners become effective mentors for others
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Indicators
|
||||
|
||||
### Adaptation Quality Measures
|
||||
- **Response Accuracy**: Teaching modifications address actual learning needs
|
||||
- **Timing Optimization**: Adaptations occur at optimal moments for maximum impact
|
||||
- **Individual Fit**: Approach matches learner's authentic preferences and strengths
|
||||
- **Growth Support**: Adaptations support learner development rather than just comfort
|
||||
- **Learning Acceleration**: Personalized approach creates faster, deeper understanding
|
||||
|
||||
### Mentoring Effectiveness
|
||||
- **Engagement Maintenance**: Sustained learner interest and active participation
|
||||
- **Understanding Depth**: Comprehensive comprehension rather than surface knowledge
|
||||
- **Transfer Success**: Application of learning to new contexts and challenges
|
||||
- **Confidence Building**: Increased learner self-efficacy and learning courage
|
||||
- **Independence Development**: Growing learner capability for self-directed learning
|
||||
|
||||
The adaptive_mentor command creates personalized learning experiences through dynamic style detection, real-time adaptation, and progressive customization that honors individual differences while optimizing learning effectiveness.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user