Initial commit

This commit is contained in:
Zhongwei Li
2025-11-29 18:20:28 +08:00
commit b727790a9e
65 changed files with 16412 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,514 @@
## Operation: Full Standards Compliance
Execute comprehensive OpenPlugins and Claude Code best practices validation with complete compliance reporting.
### Parameters from $ARGUMENTS
- **path**: Path to plugin or marketplace directory (required)
- **fix**: Auto-suggest corrections for all issues (optional, default: true)
- **format**: Output format (text|json|markdown) (optional, default: text)
### Complete Standards Check
This operation validates all four best practice categories:
1. **Naming Convention** - Lowercase-hyphen format
2. **Semantic Versioning** - MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH format
3. **Category Assignment** - One of 10 approved categories
4. **Keyword Quality** - 3-7 relevant, non-generic keywords
### Workflow
1. **Detect Target Type**
```
Parse $ARGUMENTS to extract path parameter
Detect if path is plugin or marketplace:
- Plugin: Has plugin.json
- Marketplace: Has .claude-plugin/marketplace.json
```
2. **Load Metadata**
```
IF plugin:
Read plugin.json
Extract: name, version, keywords, category
ELSE IF marketplace:
Read .claude-plugin/marketplace.json
Extract marketplace metadata
Validate each plugin entry
ELSE:
Return error: Invalid target
```
3. **Execute All Validations**
```
Run in parallel or sequence:
A. Naming Validation
Execute check-naming.md with name parameter
Store result
B. Version Validation
Execute validate-versioning.md with version parameter
Store result
C. Category Validation
Execute check-categories.md with category parameter
Store result
D. Keyword Validation
Execute validate-keywords.md with keywords parameter
Store result
```
4. **Aggregate Results**
```
Collect all validation results:
- Individual pass/fail status
- Specific issues found
- Suggested corrections
- Score impact for each
Calculate overall compliance:
- Total score: Sum of individual scores
- Pass count: Number of passing validations
- Fail count: Number of failing validations
- Compliance percentage: (pass / total) × 100
```
5. **Generate Compliance Report**
```
Create comprehensive report:
- Executive summary
- Individual validation details
- Issue prioritization
- Suggested fixes
- Compliance score
- Publication readiness
```
6. **Return Results**
```
Format according to output format:
- text: Human-readable console output
- json: Machine-parseable JSON
- markdown: Documentation-ready markdown
```
### Examples
```bash
# Full compliance check on current directory
/best-practices full-standards path:.
# Check specific plugin with JSON output
/best-practices full-standards path:./my-plugin format:json
# Check with auto-fix suggestions
/best-practices full-standards path:. fix:true
# Marketplace validation
/best-practices full-standards path:./marketplace
```
### Error Handling
**Missing path parameter**:
```
ERROR: Missing required parameter 'path'
Usage: /best-practices full-standards path:<directory>
Examples:
/best-practices full-standards path:.
/best-practices full-standards path:./my-plugin
```
**Invalid path**:
```
ERROR: Invalid path or not a plugin/marketplace
Path: <provided-path>
The path must contain either:
- plugin.json (for plugins)
- .claude-plugin/marketplace.json (for marketplaces)
Check the path and try again.
```
**Missing metadata file**:
```
ERROR: Metadata file not found
Expected one of:
- plugin.json
- .claude-plugin/marketplace.json
This does not appear to be a valid Claude Code plugin or marketplace.
```
### Output Format
**Text Format (Complete Compliance)**:
```
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
OPENPLUGINS BEST PRACTICES COMPLIANCE REPORT
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Target: code-formatter-plugin
Type: Plugin
Date: 2024-10-13
Overall Compliance: 100% ✅
Status: PUBLICATION READY
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
VALIDATION RESULTS
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
1. Naming Convention: ✅ PASS
Name: code-formatter
Format: lowercase-hyphen
Score: +5 points
The name follows OpenPlugins naming conventions perfectly.
2. Semantic Versioning: ✅ PASS
Version: 1.2.3
Format: MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH
Score: +5 points
Valid semantic version compliant with semver 2.0.0.
3. Category Assignment: ✅ PASS
Category: quality
Description: Linting, formatting, code review
Score: +5 points
Category is approved and appropriate for this plugin.
4. Keyword Quality: ✅ PASS
Keywords: formatting, javascript, eslint, code-quality, automation
Count: 5 (optimal)
Quality: 10/10
Score: +10 points
Excellent keyword selection with balanced mix.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
COMPLIANCE SUMMARY
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Validations Passed: 4/4 (100%)
Quality Score: 25/25 points
Scoring Breakdown:
✅ Naming Convention: +5 points
✅ Semantic Versioning: +5 points
✅ Category Assignment: +5 points
✅ Keyword Quality: +10 points
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Total Score: 25/25 points
Publication Status: ✅ READY FOR SUBMISSION
This plugin meets all OpenPlugins best practice standards
and is ready for marketplace submission!
Next Steps:
1. Submit to OpenPlugins marketplace
2. Follow contribution guidelines in CONTRIBUTING.md
3. Open pull request with plugin entry
```
**Text Format (Partial Compliance)**:
```
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
OPENPLUGINS BEST PRACTICES COMPLIANCE REPORT
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Target: Test_Runner
Type: Plugin
Date: 2024-10-13
Overall Compliance: 50% ⚠️
Status: NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
VALIDATION RESULTS
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
1. Naming Convention: ❌ FAIL
Name: Test_Runner
Format: Invalid
Score: 0 points
Issues Found:
- Contains uppercase characters: T, R
- Contains underscore instead of hyphen
✏️ Suggested Fix: test-runner
Impact: +5 points (if fixed)
2. Semantic Versioning: ✅ PASS
Version: 1.0.0
Format: MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH
Score: +5 points
Valid semantic version compliant with semver 2.0.0.
3. Category Assignment: ❌ FAIL
Category: test-tools
Valid: No
Score: 0 points
This category is not in the approved list.
✏️ Suggested Fix: testing
Description: Test generation, coverage, quality assurance
Impact: +5 points (if fixed)
4. Keyword Quality: ⚠️ WARNING
Keywords: plugin, tool, awesome
Count: 3 (minimum met)
Quality: 2/10
Score: 2 points
Issues Found:
- Generic terms: plugin, tool
- Marketing terms: awesome
- No functional keywords
✏️ Suggested Fix: testing, automation, pytest, unit-testing, tdd
Impact: +8 points (if improved to excellent)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
COMPLIANCE SUMMARY
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Validations Passed: 1/4 (25%)
Quality Score: 7/25 points
Scoring Breakdown:
❌ Naming Convention: 0/5 points
✅ Semantic Versioning: 5/5 points
❌ Category Assignment: 0/5 points
⚠️ Keyword Quality: 2/10 points
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Total Score: 7/25 points
Publication Status: ⚠️ NOT READY - NEEDS FIXES
Priority Fixes Required:
1. [P0] Fix naming convention: Test_Runner → test-runner
2. [P0] Fix category: test-tools → testing
3. [P1] Improve keywords: Remove generic terms, add functional keywords
After Fixes (Estimated Score):
✅ Naming Convention: +5 points
✅ Semantic Versioning: +5 points
✅ Category Assignment: +5 points
✅ Keyword Quality: +10 points
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Potential Score: 25/25 points
Next Steps:
1. Apply suggested fixes above
2. Re-run validation: /best-practices full-standards path:.
3. Ensure score reaches 25/25 before submission
```
**JSON Format**:
```json
{
"target": "code-formatter",
"type": "plugin",
"timestamp": "2024-10-13T10:00:00Z",
"compliance": {
"overall": 100,
"status": "READY",
"passed": 4,
"failed": 0,
"warnings": 0
},
"validations": {
"naming": {
"status": "pass",
"name": "code-formatter",
"format": "lowercase-hyphen",
"score": 5,
"issues": []
},
"versioning": {
"status": "pass",
"version": "1.2.3",
"format": "MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH",
"score": 5,
"issues": []
},
"category": {
"status": "pass",
"category": "quality",
"valid": true,
"score": 5,
"issues": []
},
"keywords": {
"status": "pass",
"keywords": ["formatting", "javascript", "eslint", "code-quality", "automation"],
"count": 5,
"quality": 10,
"score": 10,
"issues": []
}
},
"score": {
"total": 25,
"maximum": 25,
"percentage": 100,
"breakdown": {
"naming": 5,
"versioning": 5,
"category": 5,
"keywords": 10
}
},
"publication_ready": true,
"next_steps": [
"Submit to OpenPlugins marketplace",
"Follow contribution guidelines",
"Open pull request"
]
}
```
**Markdown Format** (for documentation):
```markdown
# OpenPlugins Best Practices Compliance Report
**Target**: code-formatter
**Type**: Plugin
**Date**: 2024-10-13
**Status**: ✅ PUBLICATION READY
## Overall Compliance
- **Score**: 25/25 points (100%)
- **Validations Passed**: 4/4
- **Publication Ready**: Yes
## Validation Results
### 1. Naming Convention ✅
- **Status**: PASS
- **Name**: code-formatter
- **Format**: lowercase-hyphen
- **Score**: +5 points
The name follows OpenPlugins naming conventions perfectly.
### 2. Semantic Versioning ✅
- **Status**: PASS
- **Version**: 1.2.3
- **Format**: MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH
- **Score**: +5 points
Valid semantic version compliant with semver 2.0.0.
### 3. Category Assignment ✅
- **Status**: PASS
- **Category**: quality
- **Description**: Linting, formatting, code review
- **Score**: +5 points
Category is approved and appropriate for this plugin.
### 4. Keyword Quality ✅
- **Status**: PASS
- **Keywords**: formatting, javascript, eslint, code-quality, automation
- **Count**: 5 (optimal)
- **Quality**: 10/10
- **Score**: +10 points
Excellent keyword selection with balanced mix.
## Score Breakdown
| Validation | Score | Status |
|------------|-------|--------|
| Naming Convention | 5/5 | ✅ Pass |
| Semantic Versioning | 5/5 | ✅ Pass |
| Category Assignment | 5/5 | ✅ Pass |
| Keyword Quality | 10/10 | ✅ Pass |
| **Total** | **25/25** | **✅ Ready** |
## Next Steps
1. Submit to OpenPlugins marketplace
2. Follow contribution guidelines in CONTRIBUTING.md
3. Open pull request with plugin entry
---
*Report generated by marketplace-validator-plugin v1.0.0*
```
### Compliance Scoring
**Total Score Breakdown**:
- Naming Convention: 5 points
- Semantic Versioning: 5 points
- Category Assignment: 5 points
- Keyword Quality: 10 points
- **Maximum Total**: 25 points
**Publication Readiness**:
- **25/25 points (100%)**: ✅ READY - Perfect compliance
- **20-24 points (80-96%)**: ✅ READY - Minor improvements optional
- **15-19 points (60-76%)**: ⚠️ NEEDS WORK - Address issues before submission
- **10-14 points (40-56%)**: ❌ NOT READY - Significant fixes required
- **0-9 points (0-36%)**: ❌ NOT READY - Major compliance issues
### Integration with Quality Analysis
This operation feeds into the overall quality scoring system:
```
Best Practices Score (25 points max)
Quality Analysis (calculate-score)
Overall Quality Score (100 points total)
Publication Readiness Determination
```
### Best Practices Workflow
For complete plugin validation:
```bash
# 1. Run full standards compliance
/best-practices full-standards path:.
# 2. If issues found, fix them, then re-run
# ... apply fixes ...
/best-practices full-standards path:.
# 3. Once compliant, run comprehensive validation
/validation-orchestrator comprehensive path:.
# 4. Review quality report
# Quality score includes best practices (25 points)
```
**Request**: $ARGUMENTS