Initial commit

commands/review.md

@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
+# Code Review with Ollama
+
+Perform comprehensive code review using ollama agents.
+
+**Usage:** `/review <file_or_directory> [strictness]`
+
+**Strictness Levels:**
+- `quick`: Fast review, major issues only
+- `standard`: Balanced review (default)
+- `thorough`: Deep analysis with security, quality, and architecture
+
+**Examples:**
+- `/review src/auth.py` - Standard review of auth module
+- `/review src/api/ thorough` - Deep review of API directory
+- `/review main.py quick` - Quick check
+
+---
+
+You are performing a code review by orchestrating ollama agents.
+
+**Target:** $1
+**Strictness:** ${2:-standard}
+
+**Your Process:**
+
+1. **Determine Scope:**
+   - Single file: Direct analysis via ollama-task-router
+   - Directory: Review key files (main entry points, complex modules)
+   - Large codebase: Focus on changed files or critical paths
+
+2. **Select Review Strategy:**
+
+   **Quick Review:**
+   Invoke ollama-task-router agent:
+   - Request: Quick code review focusing on critical bugs and security
+   - Target: $1
+   - Agent handles model selection and execution
+
+   **Standard Review:**
+   Invoke ollama-task-router agent:
+   - Request: Standard code review
+   - Checklist: Security, quality, bugs, performance, best practices
+   - Target: $1
+
+   **Thorough Review:**
+   Invoke ollama-parallel-orchestrator agent:
+   - Perspectives: security, quality, architecture, testing
+   - Target: $1
+   - Multi-angle comprehensive analysis
+
+3. **Review Checklist (for agent to cover):**
+   - Security: Injection, XSS, auth issues, secrets in code
+   - Quality: Naming, structure, complexity, duplication
+   - Bugs: Logic errors, edge cases, error handling
+   - Performance: Inefficient algorithms, memory leaks
+   - Best Practices: Language idioms, design patterns
+   - Testing: Test coverage, test quality
+
+4. **Your Role:**
+   - Invoke appropriate agent based on strictness level
+   - Receive agent's analysis
+   - Format results for user
+   - Prioritize findings by severity
+
+5. **Report Format:**
+   ```
+   ## Code Review Summary
+
+   **File/Directory:** $1
+   **Strictness:** ${2:-standard}
+
+   ### Critical Issues (Fix Immediately)
+   - [From agent analysis]
+
+   ### Major Issues (Fix Soon)
+   - [From agent analysis]
+
+   ### Minor Issues (Consider Fixing)
+   - [From agent analysis]
+
+   ### Positive Observations
+   - [From agent analysis]
+
+   ### Recommendations
+   - [Actionable items]
+   ```
+
+6. **Priority Levels:**
+   - CRITICAL: Security vulnerabilities, data loss risks
+   - MAJOR: Bugs, performance issues, maintainability problems
+   - MINOR: Style issues, minor optimizations
+
+**Remember:** Agents handle the heavy analysis. You orchestrate and present results clearly.