3.4 KiB
CLAUDE.md Audit Report
File: /Users/connor/.claude/CLAUDE.md
Generated: 2025-10-26 09:32:18
Tier: Project
Executive Summary
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Overall Health | 91/100 (Excellent) |
| Status | ✅ HEALTHY - Minor optimizations available |
| Critical Issues | 0 |
| High Priority | 0 |
| Medium Priority | 1 |
| Low Priority | 2 |
| Total Findings | 3 |
Score Dashboard
| Category | Score | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Security | 100/100 | ✅ Excellent |
| Official Compliance | 100/100 | ✅ Excellent |
| Best Practices | 100/100 | ✅ Excellent |
| Research Optimization | 97/100 | ✅ Excellent |
File Metrics
| Metric | Value | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| Lines | 167 | 100-300 lines ideal |
| Characters | 6,075 | Keep concise |
| Est. Tokens | 1,518 | < 3,000 recommended |
| Context Usage (200K) | 0.76% | < 2% ideal |
| Context Usage (1M) | 0.15% | Reference only |
✅ Assessment: File length is in optimal range (100-300 lines).
Findings
| Severity | Count | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 🚨 Critical | 0 | Security risks, immediate action required |
| ⚠️ High | 0 | Significant issues, fix this sprint |
| 📋 Medium | 1 | Moderate issues, schedule for next quarter |
| ℹ️ Low | 2 | Minor improvements, backlog |
Findings by Category
| Category | Count | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Security | 0 | Security vulnerabilities and sensitive information |
| Official Compliance | 0 | Compliance with official Anthropic documentation |
| Best Practices | 0 | Community best practices and field experience |
| Research Optimization | 1 | Research-based optimizations (lost in the middle, etc.) |
| Structure | 1 | Document structure and organization |
| Maintenance | 1 | Maintenance indicators and staleness |
Detailed Findings
📋 MEDIUM Priority
1. Potentially Broken File Paths
Category: Maintenance Source: Community Guidance
Description: Found 13 file paths that may not exist
Impact: Broken paths mislead developers and indicate stale documentation
Remediation: Verify all file paths and update or remove broken ones
ℹ️ LOW Priority
1. Minimal Organization
Category: Structure Source: Community Guidance
Description: Only 0 main sections found
Impact: May lack clear structure
Remediation: Organize into sections: Standards, Workflow, Commands, Reference
2. Critical Content in Middle Position
Category: Research Optimization Source: Research Guidance
Description: Most critical standards appear in middle section
Impact: Research shows 'lost in the middle' attention pattern. Critical info at top/bottom gets more attention.
Remediation: Move must-follow standards to top section. Move reference info to bottom. Keep nice-to-have in middle.
Priority Recommendations
💡 General Recommendations
- Regular maintenance: Schedule quarterly CLAUDE.md reviews
- Team collaboration: Share CLAUDE.md improvements via PR
- Validate effectiveness: Test that Claude follows standards without prompting
Generated by claude-md-auditor v1.0.0
Based on official Anthropic documentation, community best practices, and academic research