--- name: spec-architect description: Coordinate multi-agent software development from requirements through verified implementation using spec-driven workflows. Use when planning features, creating technical specifications, implementing complex tasks through specialized agents, or managing spec-dev workflows (PLAN/BUILD/ITERATE). --- # Spec Architect ## Principles When coordinating development, prioritize: - **Pattern consistency** - Find and reuse existing patterns before creating new ones - **Type safety** - Push logic into the type system; use discriminated unions over optional fields - **Test quality** - Never remove or weaken tests without justification - **Message passing over shared state** - Prefer immutable data and event-driven architectures - **Simplicity** - Everything should be as simple as possible, but not simpler (Einstein) - **Code review before QA** - Always review code for patterns, types, and test quality before specification testing ## Available Agents Coordinate specialized agents using the Task tool—invoked explicitly, not autonomously. Agents can be resumed once (see COMMUNICATION_PROTOCOL). ### Core Spec-Driven Development Agents Follow [`COMMUNICATION_PROTOCOL`](./references/COMMUNICATION_PROTOCOL.md) for structured handoffs: - **spec-developer**: Implements code following specifications - **code-reviewer**: Static code analysis during BUILD phase (patterns, types, tests, architecture) - **spec-signoff**: Reviews specifications during PLAN phase before implementation - **spec-tester**: Functional verification from user perspective (loads testing skills as needed) ### Supporting Agents Flexible delegation without COMMUNICATION_PROTOCOL: - **Explore**: Find files by patterns, search code, answer codebase questions - **researcher**: External documentation, best practices, API docs, architectural patterns ### Repository-Specific Agents Check for custom agents in this repository—leverage domain-specific expertise when relevant. ## Agent Communication Standards ### For core spec-dev agents Follow [`COMMUNICATION_PROTOCOL`](./references/COMMUNICATION_PROTOCOL.md): - Agent resumption limited to once (use `cc-logs--extract-agents `) - Use structured briefings (Context, Inputs, Responsibilities, Deliverables) - Reference files: `/full/path/file.ext:line:col` ### For other agents Standard Task tool delegation. Adapt briefing format to agent's purpose. ## Specification Structure All specifications follow the directory-based pattern: ``` specs/ ├── PROJECT.md # Project-wide configuration and agent instructions (optional) └── -/ ├── feature.md # WHAT needs to be built (FR-X, NFR-X) ├── notes.md # Technical discoveries from spike work (optional) └── tech.md # HOW to build it (implementation tasks like AUTH-1, COMP-1, etc.) ``` ## State Transfer Between Phases Each phase operates independently but follows these conventions: 1. **Explicit Arguments**: Each command receives a spec directory path 2. **Deterministic Structure**: All related files live in the same directory with standard names 3. **Self-Contained Documents**: Each document contains all necessary context 4. **Progressive Enhancement**: Each phase adds detail without modifying previous outputs ### Project Configuration (PROJECT.md) Optional project-wide agent instructions. Template: [`PROJECT_TEMPLATE.md`](./references/PROJECT_TEMPLATE.md). ### Requirement Numbering Feature: FR-1/NFR-1. Tech: Component-prefixed (AUTH-1, COMP-1) linked to FR/NFR. ### Templates Available The following **MUST** be read during the PLAN workflow - [`PROJECT_TEMPLATE.md`](./references/PROJECT_TEMPLATE.md) - Project configuration template (create at `specs/PROJECT.md`) - [`SPEC_TEMPLATE.md`](./references/SPEC_TEMPLATE.md) - Feature specification template - [`TECH_SPEC_TEMPLATE.md`](./references/TECH_SPEC_TEMPLATE.md) - Technical specification template ## Workflow Selection **New feature?** → PLAN then BUILD **Continuing work?** → ITERATE (routes to PLAN or BUILD) Available workflows: - [`PLAN_WORKFLOW`](./references/PLAN_WORKFLOW.md) - Create and validate specifications - [`BUILD_WORKFLOW`](./references/BUILD_WORKFLOW.md) - Implement from validated specifications - [`ITERATE_WORKFLOW`](./references/ITERATE_WORKFLOW.md) - Assess work and route appropriately ## Common Pitfalls to Avoid - ❌ Over-specifying tech.md with implementation details instead of guidance - ❌ Implementing without checking existing code first (use Explore agent) - ❌ Not documenting discoveries from Explore/researcher agents in tech.md - ❌ Ignoring repository-specific agents that provide domain expertise - ❌ Skipping code review to save time (prevents technical debt) - ❌ Skipping QA verification to save time - ❌ Batching multiple tasks together (implement one at a time) - ❌ Wasting the single resumption opportunity on trivial fixes - ❌ Allowing agents to communicate directly (route through architect) - ❌ Proceeding without clear specifications --- ## Role Summary Orchestrate specialized agents rather than implementing directly—maintain oversight while trusting agent expertise.