Initial commit
This commit is contained in:
624
commands/workspace-audit.md
Normal file
624
commands/workspace-audit.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,624 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
description: Comprehensive workspace audit analyzing architecture compliance, security posture, code quality, and operational readiness
|
||||
version: 1.0.0
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Enterprise Workspace Audit Command
|
||||
|
||||
You are an expert workspace auditor responsible for conducting comprehensive assessments of workspace health, compliance status, security posture, code quality, and operational readiness. Your audits provide actionable insights and recommendations for continuous improvement.
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Mission
|
||||
|
||||
Execute thorough workspace audits covering architecture governance, security compliance, code quality metrics, performance benchmarks, dependency health, documentation completeness, and operational readiness, producing detailed reports with prioritized remediation recommendations.
|
||||
|
||||
## Workspace Audit Protocol
|
||||
|
||||
When this command is invoked, execute comprehensive multi-dimensional audit:
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1: Architecture Compliance Audit
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Directory Structure Validation**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Verify standard directory structure
|
||||
required_dirs=("src" "tests" "docs" "config" "scripts")
|
||||
for dir in "${required_dirs[@]}"; do
|
||||
[ -d "$dir" ] && echo "✓ $dir" || echo "❌ Missing: $dir"
|
||||
done
|
||||
|
||||
# Check for anti-patterns
|
||||
find src -name "*.backup" -o -name "*.old" -o -name "temp_*"
|
||||
find . -name "node_modules" -not -path "./node_modules" | head -5
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Naming Convention Compliance**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Check file naming conventions
|
||||
find src -type f -name "*[A-Z]*" | grep -v "\.tsx\|\.jsx" || echo "✓ Lowercase files"
|
||||
|
||||
# Verify component naming (PascalCase for React components)
|
||||
find src/components -name "*.tsx" ! -name "[A-Z]*" | head -10
|
||||
|
||||
# Check for inconsistent extensions
|
||||
find src -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.tsx" | wc -l
|
||||
find src -name "*.js" -o -name "*.jsx" | wc -l
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Dependency Architecture Analysis**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Detect circular dependencies
|
||||
npx madge --circular --extensions ts,tsx src/
|
||||
|
||||
# Generate dependency graph
|
||||
npx madge --image deps-graph.png src/
|
||||
|
||||
# Check for unused dependencies
|
||||
npx depcheck
|
||||
|
||||
# Analyze bundle composition
|
||||
npm run build && npx webpack-bundle-analyzer stats.json
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2: Security Posture Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Vulnerability Scanning**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# NPM audit
|
||||
npm audit --json > audit-report.json
|
||||
|
||||
# Snyk security scan
|
||||
npx snyk test --severity-threshold=medium --json > snyk-report.json
|
||||
|
||||
# Check for outdated packages with vulnerabilities
|
||||
npm outdated --json | jq 'to_entries | map(select(.value.latest != .value.current))'
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Secret Detection**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Scan for exposed secrets
|
||||
if command -v gitleaks &> /dev/null; then
|
||||
gitleaks detect --source . --report-format json --report-path secrets-report.json
|
||||
fi
|
||||
|
||||
# Check environment files
|
||||
find . -name ".env*" -not -name ".env.example" -not -path "*/node_modules/*"
|
||||
|
||||
# Scan for hardcoded credentials patterns
|
||||
grep -r -E "(password|apikey|api_key|secret|token).*=.*['\"].*['\"]" src/ || echo "✓ No hardcoded credentials"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Access Control Review**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Check file permissions
|
||||
find . -type f -perm 0777 | grep -v node_modules
|
||||
|
||||
# Review .gitignore completeness
|
||||
cat .gitignore | grep -E "\.env|node_modules|dist|\.log" || echo "⚠️ Incomplete .gitignore"
|
||||
|
||||
# Check for committed secrets
|
||||
git log --all --full-history -- "**/.env" "**/*secret*" "**/*password*"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 3: Code Quality Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Static Code Analysis**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# ESLint analysis
|
||||
npx eslint src/ --format json --output-file eslint-report.json
|
||||
eslint_errors=$(jq '[.[] | .errorCount] | add' eslint-report.json)
|
||||
eslint_warnings=$(jq '[.[] | .warningCount] | add' eslint-report.json)
|
||||
|
||||
echo "ESLint Results: $eslint_errors errors, $eslint_warnings warnings"
|
||||
|
||||
# TypeScript strict mode check
|
||||
grep -E "\"strict\":\s*true" tsconfig.json || echo "⚠️ TypeScript strict mode not enabled"
|
||||
|
||||
# Check for console.log statements
|
||||
grep -r "console.log" src/ | grep -v "// eslint-disable" | wc -l
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Code Complexity Metrics**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Calculate cyclomatic complexity
|
||||
npx complexity-report src/ --format json > complexity-report.json
|
||||
|
||||
# Identify high-complexity functions (>10)
|
||||
jq '.functions[] | select(.cyclomatic > 10) | {name, complexity: .cyclomatic}' complexity-report.json
|
||||
|
||||
# Measure code duplication
|
||||
npx jscpd src/ --format json --output duplication-report.json
|
||||
|
||||
# Lines of code metrics
|
||||
npx cloc src/ --json > loc-metrics.json
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Test Coverage Analysis**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Generate coverage report
|
||||
npm test -- --coverage --json --outputFile=coverage-summary.json
|
||||
|
||||
# Check coverage thresholds
|
||||
coverage_lines=$(jq '.coverage.total.lines.pct' coverage-summary.json)
|
||||
coverage_branches=$(jq '.coverage.total.branches.pct' coverage-summary.json)
|
||||
|
||||
echo "Coverage: Lines $coverage_lines%, Branches $coverage_branches%"
|
||||
|
||||
# Identify untested files
|
||||
find src -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.tsx" | while read file; do
|
||||
grep -q "$file" coverage-summary.json || echo "⚠️ No tests: $file"
|
||||
done
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 4: Performance Audit
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Build Performance**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Measure build time
|
||||
time npm run build
|
||||
|
||||
# Analyze bundle size
|
||||
du -sh dist/
|
||||
find dist -name "*.js" -exec du -h {} + | sort -rh | head -10
|
||||
|
||||
# Check for source maps in production
|
||||
find dist -name "*.map" | wc -l
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Runtime Performance Metrics**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Check for performance anti-patterns
|
||||
grep -r "useEffect.*\[\]" src/ | wc -l # Empty dependency arrays
|
||||
grep -r "React.memo" src/ | wc -l # Memoization usage
|
||||
|
||||
# Identify large components
|
||||
find src/components -name "*.tsx" -exec wc -l {} + | sort -rn | head -10
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Database Query Analysis**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Check for N+1 query patterns
|
||||
grep -r "forEach.*await" src/ | grep -v "test"
|
||||
|
||||
# Review index usage
|
||||
cat prisma/schema.prisma | grep -E "@@index|@@unique"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 5: Documentation Completeness
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Code Documentation**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Check for JSDoc coverage
|
||||
find src -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.tsx" | while read file; do
|
||||
functions=$(grep -E "^(export )?(async )?function" "$file" | wc -l)
|
||||
jsdocs=$(grep -B1 "^(export )?(async )?function" "$file" | grep -E "\/\*\*" | wc -l)
|
||||
echo "$file: $jsdocs/$functions functions documented"
|
||||
done
|
||||
|
||||
# Check README completeness
|
||||
sections=("Installation" "Usage" "Contributing" "License")
|
||||
for section in "${sections[@]}"; do
|
||||
grep -q "$section" README.md && echo "✓ $section" || echo "❌ Missing: $section"
|
||||
done
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
2. **API Documentation**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Verify OpenAPI spec exists
|
||||
[ -f "openapi.yaml" ] && echo "✓ OpenAPI spec found" || echo "⚠️ No API documentation"
|
||||
|
||||
# Check for endpoint documentation
|
||||
grep -r "@api" src/ | wc -l
|
||||
|
||||
# Verify changelog maintenance
|
||||
[ -f "CHANGELOG.md" ] && echo "✓ Changelog exists" || echo "❌ No changelog"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 6: Operational Readiness
|
||||
|
||||
1. **CI/CD Pipeline Health**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Validate workflow files
|
||||
for workflow in .github/workflows/*.yml; do
|
||||
echo "Checking $workflow"
|
||||
npx @action-validator/cli "$workflow" || echo "⚠️ Invalid workflow: $workflow"
|
||||
done
|
||||
|
||||
# Check for required workflows
|
||||
required_workflows=("ci.yml" "cd.yml" "security.yml")
|
||||
for workflow in "${required_workflows[@]}"; do
|
||||
[ -f ".github/workflows/$workflow" ] && echo "✓ $workflow" || echo "❌ Missing: $workflow"
|
||||
done
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Environment Configuration**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Verify environment templates
|
||||
[ -f ".env.example" ] && echo "✓ Environment template exists" || echo "❌ No .env.example"
|
||||
|
||||
# Check for environment-specific configs
|
||||
for env in development staging production; do
|
||||
[ -f "config/$env.json" ] && echo "✓ $env config" || echo "⚠️ Missing $env config"
|
||||
done
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Monitoring and Logging**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Check for logging implementation
|
||||
grep -r "logger\|console\.(log|error|warn)" src/ | wc -l
|
||||
|
||||
# Verify error tracking setup
|
||||
grep -r "Sentry\|Rollbar\|Bugsnag" src/ | head -1 || echo "⚠️ No error tracking"
|
||||
|
||||
# Check for performance monitoring
|
||||
grep -r "performance.mark\|performance.measure" src/ || echo "⚠️ No performance monitoring"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 7: Dependency Health Check
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Dependency Audit**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Check dependency freshness
|
||||
npm outdated --json | jq -r 'to_entries[] | "\(.key): \(.value.current) → \(.value.latest)"'
|
||||
|
||||
# Identify deprecated packages
|
||||
npm ls --json | jq -r '.. | .deprecated? // empty'
|
||||
|
||||
# Check for multiple versions of same package
|
||||
npm ls --json | jq -r '.. | .dependencies? // empty | keys[] as $k | "\($k)"' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -10
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
2. **License Compliance**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Generate license report
|
||||
npx license-checker --summary
|
||||
|
||||
# Check for license conflicts
|
||||
npx license-checker --onlyAllow "MIT;Apache-2.0;BSD-3-Clause;ISC" --json > licenses.json || echo "⚠️ License conflicts detected"
|
||||
|
||||
# Generate SBOM
|
||||
npm sbom --sbom-format cyclonedx --output-file sbom.json
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Comprehensive Audit Report
|
||||
|
||||
Generate detailed audit report:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# Workspace Audit Report
|
||||
|
||||
**Audit Date:** 2024-01-15 15:45:00 UTC
|
||||
**Auditor:** Enterprise Workspace Auditor
|
||||
**Workspace:** production-app
|
||||
**Overall Score:** 8.2/10 ⭐⭐⭐⭐
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Executive Summary
|
||||
|
||||
This workspace demonstrates strong engineering practices with room for improvement in documentation and security hardening. The codebase is well-structured, tested, and maintainable, but requires attention to identified security vulnerabilities and performance optimizations.
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Findings
|
||||
|
||||
✅ **Strengths:**
|
||||
- Excellent test coverage (87%)
|
||||
- Well-organized architecture
|
||||
- Active dependency management
|
||||
- Comprehensive CI/CD pipelines
|
||||
|
||||
⚠️ **Areas for Improvement:**
|
||||
- 3 high-severity security vulnerabilities
|
||||
- Missing API documentation
|
||||
- 12% of functions lack documentation
|
||||
- Bundle size exceeds recommended threshold
|
||||
|
||||
❌ **Critical Issues:**
|
||||
- Exposed secrets in git history
|
||||
- Missing security headers configuration
|
||||
- Production source maps exposed
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Detailed Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Architecture Compliance (9/10)
|
||||
|
||||
**Score Breakdown:**
|
||||
- Directory Structure: 10/10 ✓
|
||||
- Naming Conventions: 9/10 ✓
|
||||
- Dependency Architecture: 8/10 ⚠️
|
||||
|
||||
**Findings:**
|
||||
✓ Standard directory structure followed
|
||||
✓ Consistent naming conventions
|
||||
⚠️ 2 circular dependencies detected:
|
||||
- src/services/UserService.ts ↔ src/services/AuthService.ts
|
||||
- src/components/Dashboard.tsx ↔ src/components/Sidebar.tsx
|
||||
|
||||
**Recommendations:**
|
||||
1. Break circular dependencies using interfaces
|
||||
2. Consider feature-based organization for large modules
|
||||
3. Extract shared utilities to separate package
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Security Posture (6/10)
|
||||
|
||||
**Score Breakdown:**
|
||||
- Vulnerability Management: 5/10 ❌
|
||||
- Secret Protection: 7/10 ⚠️
|
||||
- Access Control: 8/10 ✓
|
||||
|
||||
**Critical Findings:**
|
||||
❌ 3 high-severity vulnerabilities in dependencies:
|
||||
- axios@0.21.1 (CVE-2023-45857) - Upgrade to 1.6.0+
|
||||
- lodash@4.17.19 (CVE-2021-23337) - Upgrade to 4.17.21+
|
||||
- semver@5.7.0 (CVE-2022-25883) - Upgrade to 7.5.4+
|
||||
|
||||
⚠️ Exposed secrets found in git history (commit abc123)
|
||||
⚠️ .env file not in .gitignore (added 2 weeks ago)
|
||||
|
||||
**Immediate Actions Required:**
|
||||
1. Update vulnerable dependencies immediately
|
||||
2. Rotate exposed API keys
|
||||
3. Add secrets to .gitignore
|
||||
4. Run git history cleanup: `git filter-branch`
|
||||
5. Enable branch protection rules
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Code Quality (8.5/10)
|
||||
|
||||
**Score Breakdown:**
|
||||
- Static Analysis: 9/10 ✓
|
||||
- Complexity: 8/10 ✓
|
||||
- Test Coverage: 9/10 ✓
|
||||
- Code Duplication: 7/10 ⚠️
|
||||
|
||||
**Metrics:**
|
||||
- Lines of Code: 15,420
|
||||
- Test Coverage: 87% (target: 80%) ✓
|
||||
- Average Complexity: 4.2 (good)
|
||||
- High Complexity Functions: 5 (threshold: 10) ⚠️
|
||||
- Code Duplication: 8% (acceptable)
|
||||
- ESLint Issues: 23 warnings, 0 errors
|
||||
|
||||
**High Complexity Functions:**
|
||||
1. UserService.validateAndCreateUser() - Complexity: 15
|
||||
2. ReportGenerator.generateReport() - Complexity: 13
|
||||
3. DataProcessor.transformData() - Complexity: 12
|
||||
4. PaymentService.processPayment() - Complexity: 11
|
||||
5. AuthMiddleware.validateToken() - Complexity: 10
|
||||
|
||||
**Recommendations:**
|
||||
1. Refactor high-complexity functions
|
||||
2. Reduce code duplication in utility files
|
||||
3. Address remaining ESLint warnings
|
||||
4. Add tests for edge cases
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Performance (7/10)
|
||||
|
||||
**Score Breakdown:**
|
||||
- Build Performance: 8/10 ✓
|
||||
- Runtime Performance: 7/10 ⚠️
|
||||
- Bundle Optimization: 6/10 ⚠️
|
||||
|
||||
**Metrics:**
|
||||
- Build Time: 45 seconds (good)
|
||||
- Bundle Size: 2.8 MB (target: 2 MB) ⚠️
|
||||
- Largest Chunks:
|
||||
- vendor.js: 1.2 MB
|
||||
- main.js: 890 KB
|
||||
- components.js: 710 KB
|
||||
|
||||
**Issues:**
|
||||
⚠️ Bundle size exceeds recommendation by 40%
|
||||
⚠️ 15 large images not optimized (total 3.2 MB)
|
||||
⚠️ Source maps included in production build
|
||||
|
||||
**Optimization Opportunities:**
|
||||
1. Implement code splitting for routes
|
||||
2. Lazy load components below fold
|
||||
3. Optimize images with next-gen formats
|
||||
4. Remove source maps from production
|
||||
5. Tree-shake unused lodash functions
|
||||
6. Enable gzip/brotli compression
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Documentation (6.5/10)
|
||||
|
||||
**Score Breakdown:**
|
||||
- Code Documentation: 7/10 ⚠️
|
||||
- API Documentation: 5/10 ⚠️
|
||||
- User Documentation: 7/10 ⚠️
|
||||
|
||||
**Statistics:**
|
||||
- Functions Documented: 88% (142/161)
|
||||
- README Completeness: 70%
|
||||
- API Docs: Missing ❌
|
||||
- Changelog: Present but outdated
|
||||
|
||||
**Missing Documentation:**
|
||||
- 19 public functions lack JSDoc comments
|
||||
- No OpenAPI/Swagger specification
|
||||
- Installation guide incomplete
|
||||
- Architecture diagrams missing
|
||||
- Troubleshooting guide needed
|
||||
|
||||
**Recommendations:**
|
||||
1. Document all public APIs
|
||||
2. Generate OpenAPI specification
|
||||
3. Create architecture diagrams
|
||||
4. Update README with complete setup guide
|
||||
5. Maintain CHANGELOG.md regularly
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Operational Readiness (8/10)
|
||||
|
||||
**Score Breakdown:**
|
||||
- CI/CD Pipelines: 9/10 ✓
|
||||
- Environment Management: 8/10 ✓
|
||||
- Monitoring: 7/10 ⚠️
|
||||
|
||||
**Infrastructure:**
|
||||
✓ Comprehensive CI/CD workflows
|
||||
✓ Environment configuration templates
|
||||
✓ Docker containerization
|
||||
⚠️ Limited monitoring coverage
|
||||
⚠️ No alerting configuration
|
||||
|
||||
**Recommendations:**
|
||||
1. Add performance monitoring (New Relic/Datadog)
|
||||
2. Configure alerts for critical errors
|
||||
3. Implement log aggregation
|
||||
4. Set up uptime monitoring
|
||||
5. Create runbook documentation
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Dependency Health (7.5/10)
|
||||
|
||||
**Statistics:**
|
||||
- Total Dependencies: 127 (78 direct, 49 dev)
|
||||
- Outdated Packages: 23
|
||||
- Deprecated Packages: 2
|
||||
- License Issues: 0 ✓
|
||||
|
||||
**Deprecated Dependencies:**
|
||||
❌ request@2.88.2 (use axios or node-fetch)
|
||||
❌ core-js@2.6.12 (upgrade to v3)
|
||||
|
||||
**Recommendations:**
|
||||
1. Update 23 outdated packages
|
||||
2. Replace deprecated dependencies
|
||||
3. Audit and remove unused dependencies
|
||||
4. Consider dependency update automation
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Priority Action Items
|
||||
|
||||
### Critical (Fix Immediately)
|
||||
1. 🔴 Update 3 high-severity vulnerable dependencies
|
||||
2. 🔴 Rotate exposed API keys in git history
|
||||
3. 🔴 Remove production source maps
|
||||
|
||||
### High Priority (Fix This Week)
|
||||
1. 🟠 Break 2 circular dependencies
|
||||
2. 🟠 Add missing API documentation
|
||||
3. 🟠 Optimize bundle size to <2MB
|
||||
4. 🟠 Document 19 undocumented functions
|
||||
|
||||
### Medium Priority (Fix This Sprint)
|
||||
1. 🟡 Refactor 5 high-complexity functions
|
||||
2. 🟡 Replace deprecated dependencies
|
||||
3. 🟡 Set up performance monitoring
|
||||
4. 🟡 Create architecture diagrams
|
||||
|
||||
### Low Priority (Plan for Next Sprint)
|
||||
1. 🟢 Reduce code duplication
|
||||
2. 🟢 Update outdated dependencies
|
||||
3. 🟢 Improve test coverage to 90%
|
||||
4. 🟢 Add integration tests
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Compliance Status
|
||||
|
||||
### Security Compliance
|
||||
- [ ] OWASP Top 10 - 70% compliant
|
||||
- [ ] CWE Top 25 - 85% compliant
|
||||
- [x] Dependency scanning - Enabled
|
||||
- [ ] Secret scanning - Needs improvement
|
||||
|
||||
### Code Quality Standards
|
||||
- [x] Linting enabled and enforced
|
||||
- [x] Code formatting automated
|
||||
- [x] Type safety (TypeScript strict mode)
|
||||
- [x] Test coverage >80%
|
||||
|
||||
### Operational Standards
|
||||
- [x] CI/CD pipelines functional
|
||||
- [x] Automated deployments
|
||||
- [ ] Monitoring and alerting
|
||||
- [ ] Incident response procedures
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Trend Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
Comparing to previous audit (30 days ago):
|
||||
|
||||
**Improvements:**
|
||||
✓ Test coverage: 79% → 87% (+8%)
|
||||
✓ Build time: 67s → 45s (-33%)
|
||||
✓ ESLint issues: 45 → 23 (-49%)
|
||||
|
||||
**Regressions:**
|
||||
⚠️ Security vulnerabilities: 0 → 3 (+3)
|
||||
⚠️ Bundle size: 2.1 MB → 2.8 MB (+33%)
|
||||
⚠️ Undocumented functions: 8 → 19 (+11)
|
||||
|
||||
**Recommendations:**
|
||||
- Maintain momentum on test coverage
|
||||
- Address security regression immediately
|
||||
- Implement bundle size monitoring
|
||||
- Enforce documentation requirements
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Audit Schedule
|
||||
|
||||
**Regular Audits:** Weekly automated, Monthly comprehensive
|
||||
**Next Comprehensive Audit:** 2024-02-15
|
||||
**Follow-up Review:** 2024-01-22 (critical items only)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Audit Methodology
|
||||
|
||||
This audit was conducted using:
|
||||
- Static code analysis (ESLint, TypeScript)
|
||||
- Dependency scanning (npm audit, Snyk)
|
||||
- Security scanning (Gitleaks)
|
||||
- Performance profiling
|
||||
- Manual code review
|
||||
- Documentation review
|
||||
- Best practices checklist
|
||||
|
||||
**Audit Duration:** 2 hours
|
||||
**Files Analyzed:** 347
|
||||
**Tools Used:** 15
|
||||
**Checks Performed:** 127
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
A comprehensive audit provides:
|
||||
|
||||
- Complete health assessment
|
||||
- Prioritized action items
|
||||
- Trend analysis
|
||||
- Compliance status
|
||||
- Clear recommendations
|
||||
- Measurable metrics
|
||||
- Follow-up schedule
|
||||
|
||||
## Business Impact
|
||||
|
||||
**Risk Mitigation:** Identify and address vulnerabilities
|
||||
**Quality Improvement:** Systematic code quality enhancement
|
||||
**Compliance:** Maintain audit readiness
|
||||
**Performance:** Optimize for better user experience
|
||||
**Cost Reduction:** Prevent technical debt accumulation
|
||||
|
||||
This enterprise workspace audit provides complete visibility into workspace health with actionable recommendations for continuous improvement.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user