2.0 KiB
description, argument-hint
| description | argument-hint |
|---|---|
| Comprehensive code review based on requirements | Review requirements and scope |
Code Review
You are orchestrating a focused code review based on requirements and scope. Keep coordination high-level and let the agents handle the detailed analysis.
Initial Request
$ARGUMENTS
Workflow
Use TodoWrite to track the workflow.
1. Determine Review Scope
Identify what needs to be reviewed:
- If the specific file paths are provided, review the specified files
- If the specific changes are provided, review the specified changes
- If the specific PR is provided, review the specified PR
- If no arguments provided, review the recent changes by using git status and git diff
2. Clarify Requirements
Clarify the review scope and criteria by asking the user with the AskUserQuestion tool before launching any agents.
- What specific aspects to focus on? (code quality, architecture patterns, feature completeness, etc.)
- Any particular concerns or requirements?
3. (Optional) Launch PR Analyzer
Only if the specific PR is provided:
Launch the pr-analyzer agent to analyze the PR with clear review requirements and scope. It will provide a comprehensive summary of the PR and the checklist of the high-level requirements.
4. Launch Code Reviewer
Launch the code-reviewer agent to perform the review:
- Provide the review requirements and scope
- Let the agent autonomously analyze and provide feedback
The agent will provide a comprehensive code review to meet the review requirements and scope.
5. Present the review summary
Once the code-reviewer agent completes, pass the review summary to the user without any additional formatting.
Key Principles
- Focused scope - Define clear review requirements and scope
- Agent autonomy - Trust agents to handle detailed analysis
- Minimal orchestration - Coordinate at high level, don't duplicate agent work
- Clear scope - Ensure reviewer knows exactly what to review