Initial commit

prd-authoring/examples/02-research-example.md

@@ -0,0 +1,315 @@
+---
+title: Payment Gateway Integration Research
+type: research
+status: complete
+created: 2025-11-04
+updated: 2025-11-04
+---
+
+# Research: Payment Gateway Integration
+
+## Competitive Analysis
+
+### Competitor 1: Stripe
+
+**Overview**
+Market leader in developer-focused payment processing with 40%+ market share among tech companies. Powers payment processing for millions of businesses worldwide including Amazon, Shopify, and Lyft.
+
+**Strengths**
+- Superior API design and documentation (rated #1 by developers)
+- Supports 135+ currencies and 45+ countries
+- Comprehensive fraud detection with Radar (machine learning-based)
+- Strong developer ecosystem with extensive libraries
+- Excellent uptime (99.99% historical availability)
+- Built-in PCI compliance (SAQ-A eligible)
+- Transparent, predictable pricing
+
+**Weaknesses**
+- Higher fees for international cards (3.9% + $0.30 vs 2.9% + $0.30 domestic)
+- Limited phone support (primarily email and chat)
+- Can hold funds for new accounts (rolling reserve for high-risk industries)
+
+**Key Features**
+- Payment processing (cards, wallets, bank transfers)
+- Recurring billing and subscription management
+- Payment method tokenization
+- 3D Secure 2.0 and fraud detection
+- Real-time webhooks
+- Mobile SDKs for iOS and Android
+
+**Pricing Model**
+Standard: 2.9% + $0.30 per successful card charge (US domestic), 3.9% + $0.30 for international. No setup or monthly fees.
+
+**Market Position**
+Premium developer-friendly solution targeting startups, SaaS companies, and growth-stage businesses.
+
+**Our Advantage Over Them**
+We leverage their strengths while they handle payment processing complexity, compliance, and fraud detection.
+
+---
+
+### Competitor 2: PayPal/Braintree
+
+**Overview**
+Consumer payment giant with 400M+ active accounts. Braintree is PayPal's developer product. Strong brand recognition and customer trust.
+
+**Strengths**
+- Massive user base (400M+ PayPal accounts)
+- Strong buyer trust and brand recognition
+- Built-in buyer protection
+- Venmo integration
+- International presence in 200+ markets
+
+**Weaknesses**
+- Higher dispute and chargeback rates
+- More complex API compared to Stripe
+- Account holds more common
+- Slower innovation
+
+**Key Features**
+- PayPal checkout
+- Credit/debit cards via Braintree
+- Venmo integration
+- PayPal Credit (BNPL)
+- Recurring billing support
+
+**Pricing Model**
+PayPal Standard: 3.49% + $0.49, Braintree: 2.59% + $0.49
+
+**Market Position**
+Consumer-focused platform with strong brand trust, prioritizing buyer confidence over developer experience.
+
+**Our Advantage Over Them**
+PayPal's higher fees and complex integration make Stripe more attractive. May add PayPal in Phase 2.
+
+---
+
+### Competitor 3: Square
+
+**Overview**
+Payment processor for small businesses and omnichannel commerce. Known for simple pricing and POS hardware.
+
+**Strengths**
+- Unified platform for in-person and online
+- Simple, flat-rate pricing
+- No monthly fees or commitments
+- Fast payouts (next business day)
+- Integrated POS hardware
+
+**Weaknesses**
+- Limited international support
+- Fewer currencies than Stripe
+- Less sophisticated API capabilities
+- Higher fees for keyed transactions
+
+**Key Features**
+- Card processing (in-person and online)
+- Square Terminal and readers
+- Inventory management
+- Invoicing and recurring payments
+- E-commerce integration
+
+**Pricing Model**
+Online: 2.9% + $0.30, In-person: 2.6% + $0.10, Keyed: 3.5% + $0.15. No monthly fees.
+
+**Market Position**
+Small business and retail-focused, positioned as simple all-in-one for businesses needing both online and in-person.
+
+**Our Advantage Over Them**
+Square is optimized for retail/POS, not pure e-commerce. Stripe's API-first approach suits our needs better.
+
+---
+
+## Market Insights
+
+### Market Size & Growth
+Global digital payment market: $79.3B in 2020 → $154.1B by 2025 (14.2% CAGR). Growth drivers: e-commerce adoption, shift from cash, mobile wallets, subscriptions.
+
+**Primary segment: E-commerce businesses (SMB)**
+- Size: 2.1 million e-commerce businesses in US
+- Growth rate: 15% annual growth
+- Key characteristics: Need reliable, easy-to-integrate processing with low fixed costs
+
+### Market Trends
+- Mobile wallet adoption: 25% of e-commerce transactions (up from 10% in 2020)
+- One-click checkout: 40% abandon if they must re-enter payment details
+- Buy Now, Pay Later: 300% growth since 2020 for purchases >$200
+- Fraud concerns: $20B globally in 2021, driving demand for advanced detection
+- Embedded finance: Payment processing embedded directly in software platforms
+
+### Regulatory & Compliance
+- PCI DSS Level 1: Required for card processing; using tokenization (SAQ-A) reduces compliance burden
+- Strong Customer Authentication (SCA): EU regulation requiring 2FA; 3D Secure 2.0 is table stakes
+- Data privacy (GDPR, CCPA): Payment data subject to strict privacy regulations
+
+### Industry Standards & Best Practices
+- OAuth 2.0 for API authentication
+- 3D Secure 2.0 for SCA compliance
+- Tokenization (never store card numbers)
+- Webhooks for async events
+- TLS 1.3 for encryption
+- CVV verification for fraud reduction
+
+## User Feedback Analysis
+
+### Common Pain Points
+
+1. **Checkout complexity**: 70% mention as pain point. "I filled my cart but gave up at the 8-step checkout"
+   - Impact: 69.8% average cart abandonment rate
+
+2. **Payment method limitations**: 40% request more options. "No Apple Pay, went to competitor"
+   - Impact: 10-15% abandon if preferred method unavailable
+
+3. **Security concerns**: 55% cite as top concern. "Don't feel safe entering card on small websites"
+   - Impact: Trust badges increase conversion 20-30%
+
+4. **Re-entering information**: 60% of returning customers frustrated. "Why can't this site remember my card like Amazon?"
+   - Impact: Saved methods reduce checkout time 75%
+
+5. **Slow processing**: 30% mention frustration. "Waited 10 seconds, thought it failed"
+   - Impact: Each second reduces conversions 7%
+
+### Desired Features
+
+**Must-have** (Table stakes)
+- Credit/debit card acceptance (Visa, MC, Amex, Discover)
+- Mobile-responsive checkout
+- Secure processing with trust indicators
+- Email receipt and confirmation
+- Basic fraud detection
+
+**High-value** (Differentiators)
+- Digital wallets (Apple Pay, Google Pay)
+- One-click for returning customers
+- Guest checkout option
+- Real-time updates during checkout
+- Instant confirmation
+
+**Nice-to-have** (Future)
+- Buy now, pay later (Klarna, Affirm)
+- Cryptocurrency support
+- International currencies
+- Subscription billing
+
+### User Preferences & Expectations
+- Checkout speed: Complete within 60 seconds (2 min maximum tolerance)
+- Payment security: Want trust badges, recognizable brands
+- Guest checkout: 25% prefer not to create account first
+- Save payment: 70% willing if they trust the site
+- Mobile: 60% of traffic; expect wallet options
+- Error messages: Want clear, actionable feedback
+
+## Technical Considerations
+
+### Competitor Technical Approaches
+- **Tokenization**: All providers use it to avoid storing card data (SAQ-A vs SAQ-D compliance)
+- **Integration patterns**: Hosted (easiest), Elements (balanced), API (most flexible)
+- **Webhooks**: All use for async event handling (requires retry logic, idempotency)
+
+### Architecture Patterns
+- **PSP pattern**: Use third-party provider vs building in-house
+  - Pros: Fast deployment, reduced compliance, proven reliability
+  - Cons: Dependency, transaction fees
+  - Recommendation: Strongly recommended
+
+- **Event-driven**: Use webhooks for downstream actions
+  - Pros: Decouples payment from business logic
+  - Cons: Requires robust event processing
+  - Recommendation: Essential for production
+
+### Integration Requirements
+- Stripe SDK: REST API + JavaScript SDK
+- CRM: Salesforce (update customer records, orders)
+- Accounting: QuickBooks (automated posting, reconciliation)
+- Email: SendGrid (confirmations, receipts, failures)
+
+### Performance & Scalability
+- Expected load: 1,000/month currently, 5,000/month in 6 months
+- Performance targets: API <500ms p95, checkout <3s total, page load <2s
+- Scalability: Stripe handles scaling, we need webhook queue for high volume
+
+### Technical Risks
+- Stripe downtime: 99.99% uptime but would block all payments
+  - Mitigation: Graceful degradation, monitoring, communication plan
+
+- Webhook failures: Network issues could cause missed events
+  - Mitigation: Stripe retries for 3 days, implement idempotency, poll as backup
+
+- PCI violations: Improper storage could result in fines
+  - Mitigation: Never store cards, use tokens, annual SAQ-A, security audits
+
+- Fraud: Costs 2-3x transaction amount
+  - Mitigation: Stripe Radar, CVV required, 3D Secure, velocity limits
+
+## Recommendations
+
+### Priority Features
+
+**Must-build**
+1. Credit/debit card processing - 100% of competitors have this, 80% of transactions
+2. PCI compliance - Legal requirement, use Stripe tokenization for SAQ-A
+3. Mobile-responsive - 60% of traffic is mobile
+4. Basic fraud detection - 1-2% fraud rate costs 2-3x transaction value
+
+**Should-build**
+1. Digital wallets - 25% of transactions, converts 10-15% higher
+2. Saved payment methods - 75% faster checkout, 30-40% higher repeat rate
+3. CRM/accounting integration - Saves $100K annually in manual work
+
+**Could-build**
+- BNPL (Phase 2), Cryptocurrency (Phase 3), Subscriptions (Phase 2)
+
+### Technical Approach
+
+**Recommended**: Cloud-native API integration with event-driven fulfillment
+
+**Key choices**:
+- Payment processor: Stripe (best DX, features, pricing, documentation)
+- Integration: Stripe Elements (balances customization with ease)
+- Backend: Stripe Node.js SDK
+- Events: Webhook processing with queue (Bull/Redis or SQS)
+- Database: Add payment_methods and transactions tables (metadata only, no card data)
+
+### Go-to-Market Positioning
+"Complete your purchase in under 60 seconds with secure, one-click checkout - just like major e-commerce brands"
+
+**Target**: E-commerce customers (B2C) expecting modern, frictionless experiences
+
+**Differentiators**:
+- 60 seconds vs 3-5 minutes competitors
+- Amazon-like one-click for returning customers
+- Multiple payment methods including Apple/Google Pay
+- Enterprise security with consumer UX
+
+### Constraints & Considerations
+
+**Compliance**: PCI DSS SAQ-A (cannot store card numbers)
+
+**Budget**: 2.9% + $0.30 = $99K annually at 1,000 transactions averaging $275
+- Acceptable given $1.8M revenue recovery
+
+**Timeline**: Q2 2026 (6 months) - favors proven solutions
+
+**Resources**: 2 FE, 1 BE, 1 QA - must use SDK/libraries, not build from scratch
+
+### Risk Assessment
+
+1. **Stripe dependency**
+   - Likelihood: Low, Impact: High
+   - Mitigation: Monitor status, communication plan, backup provider Phase 2
+
+2. **Fraud/chargebacks**
+   - Likelihood: Medium (1-2%), Impact: Medium ($200-500 per incident)
+   - Mitigation: Radar, CVV, velocity limits, 3D Secure for high-value
+
+3. **Integration complexity**
+   - Likelihood: Medium, Impact: Medium (delay or missing features)
+   - Mitigation: Official SDKs, integration guides, schedule buffer
+
+4. **User adoption of saved payments**
+   - Likelihood: Low (60-70% industry), Impact: Low
+   - Mitigation: Security messaging, trust indicators, incentives
+
+5. **Compliance violations**
+   - Likelihood: Low (following best practices), Impact: High (fines, loss of processing)
+   - Mitigation: Never store cards, annual SAQ-A, security audits